| Message ID | 20190621103258.8154-1-tony.xie@rock-chips.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | support a new type of PMIC, including two chips(rk817 and rk809) | expand |
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Tony Xie wrote: > Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same, > so they can share allmost all codes. > > Their specifications are as follows: > 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same > registers > for these components except dcdc5. > 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809. > 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two. Just tried to apply this set to a v5.2-rc1 base, but it doesn't seem to do so cleanly. Would you be able to rebase and resend please?
Hi Lee, Am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2019, 13:52:51 CEST schrieb Lee Jones: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Tony Xie wrote: > > > Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same, > > so they can share allmost all codes. > > > > Their specifications are as follows: > > 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same > > registers > > for these components except dcdc5. > > 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809. > > 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two. > > Just tried to apply this set to a v5.2-rc1 base, but it doesn't seem > to do so cleanly. Would you be able to rebase and resend please? I took the liberty of rebasing patch 3 accordingly and sent it as reply to the original patch3 as (v10.1). The other patches did apply cleanly after that. Heiko
Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same, so they can share allmost all codes. Their specifications are as follows: 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same registers for these components except dcdc5. 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809. 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two. Changes in V2: 1. initialize the pm_pwroff_fn to NULL. 2. use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL to export pm_power_off_prepare. 3. change patch 2/3/4/5 subjects. Changes in V3 1. change patch 4 subjects 2. replace pr_ with dev_ for printing in patch 2 3. modify switch1 and switch2 configs in patch 2 4. explain gpio information for rk809 and rk817 in patch 4 Changes in V4: 1. modify some codes for patch 2 and patch 5 according to comments 2. add reviewer mail lists for patch 3 and 4 Changes in V5: modify some codes for patch 1 according to reveiw comments for v3. 1) remove the pm_power_off_prepare() and replace with shutdown call-back from syscore 2) move the macro REGMAP_IRQ_M into the regmap.h and rename it REGMAP_IRQ_LINE 3) make some dev_warn() log clear Changes in V6: modify some codes according to reveiw comments for v5. Changes in V7: modify some codes for patch 2 according to reveiw comments. Changes in V8: For helping me promote this work, Heiko send the V8 Changes in V9: 1.base on the V8 2.modify some codes according to reveiw comments for V8 from Mark Brown Changes in V10: And Ack from Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> for parch 3 Tony Xie (6): mfd: rk808: remove the id_table mfd: rk808: Add RK817 and RK809 support regulator: rk808: add RK809 and RK817 support. dt-bindings: mfd: rk808: Add binding information for RK809 and RK817. rtc: rk808: add RK809 and RK817 support. clk: RK808: add RK809 and RK817 support. .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/rk808.txt | 44 ++ drivers/clk/Kconfig | 9 +- drivers/clk/clk-rk808.c | 64 +- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 6 +- drivers/mfd/rk808.c | 199 +++++- drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 4 +- drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c | 646 +++++++++++++++++- drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 4 +- drivers/rtc/rtc-rk808.c | 68 +- include/linux/mfd/rk808.h | 175 +++++ 10 files changed, 1155 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)