| Message ID | 20200204090940.1225-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | irqchip/gic-v4.1: Cleanup and fixes for GICv4.1 | expand |
Hi Zenghui, On 2020-02-04 09:09, Zenghui Yu wrote: > Hi, > > This series contains some cleanups, VPROPBASER field programming fix > and level2 vPE table allocation enhancement, collected while looking > through the GICv4.1 driver one more time. > > Hope they will help, thanks! > > Zenghui Yu (5): > irqchip/gic-v4.1: Fix programming of GICR_VPROPBASER_4_1_SIZE > irqchip/gic-v4.1: Set vpe_l1_base for all redistributors > irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure L2 vPE table is allocated at RD level > irqchip/gic-v4.1: Drop 'tmp' in inherit_vpe_l1_table_from_rd() > irqchip/gic-v3-its: Remove superfluous WARN_ON > > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Thanks a lot for this, much appreciated, I'm quite happy with the overall state of the series. If you can just address the couple of nits I have on patch #3, I'll then queue the series and send off to Thomas together with the rest of the queued fixes. Thanks, M.
Hi Marc, On 2020/2/5 20:46, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Zenghui, > > On 2020-02-04 09:09, Zenghui Yu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This series contains some cleanups, VPROPBASER field programming fix >> and level2 vPE table allocation enhancement, collected while looking >> through the GICv4.1 driver one more time. >> >> Hope they will help, thanks! >> >> Zenghui Yu (5): >> irqchip/gic-v4.1: Fix programming of GICR_VPROPBASER_4_1_SIZE >> irqchip/gic-v4.1: Set vpe_l1_base for all redistributors >> irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure L2 vPE table is allocated at RD level >> irqchip/gic-v4.1: Drop 'tmp' in inherit_vpe_l1_table_from_rd() >> irqchip/gic-v3-its: Remove superfluous WARN_ON >> >> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > Thanks a lot for this, much appreciated, I'm quite happy with the overall > state of the series. If you can just address the couple of nits I have on > patch #3, I'll then queue the series and send off to Thomas together with > the rest of the queued fixes. I will respin patch#3 with your suggestion and send v2 today. Thanks for your review! Zenghui