Message ID | 20201028202914.43662-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | SCMI vendor protocols and modularization | expand |
On 10/28/20 4:29 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote: > The current revision of this series still does not address the possibility > of creating dynamically the SCMI devices: any new protocols must be added > to the SCMI embedded module device table as of now, while it could be > desirable to have such devices created dynamically whenever a new protocol > is added and loaded into the system. Hi Cristian, Thanks for v2. I have raised my concerns previously as well on having a static table in the main scmi framework for managing the client devices. This will be a bottleneck not just for vendor protocol addition but also to extend the currently supported list of scmi protocols. I will wait for your v3 (as you mentioned previously) for fixes around this.