mbox series

[v2,0/4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clock scaling

Message ID 20201216131639.4128-1-stanley.chu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clock scaling | expand

Message

Stanley Chu Dec. 16, 2020, 1:16 p.m. UTC
Hi,
This series cleans up and refactors clk-scaling feature, and shall not change any functionality.

This series is based on Can's series "Three changes related with UFS clock scaling" in 5.10/scsi-fixes branch in Martin's tree.

However this series may not be required to be merged to 5.10. The choice of base branch is simply making these patches easy to be reviewed because this series is based on clk-scaling fixes by Can. If this series is decided not being merged to 5.10, then I would rebase it to 5.11/scsi-queue.

Changes since v1:
  - Refactor ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend() in patch [3/4]
  - Change function name from ufshcd_clk_scaling_pm() to ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend() in patch [3/4]
  - Refine patch titles

Stanley Chu (4):
  scsi: ufs: Refactor cancelling clkscaling works
  scsi: ufs: Remove redundant null checking of devfreq instance
  scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clk-scaling feature
  scsi: ufs: Fix build warning by incorrect function description

 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

Comments

Stanley Chu Dec. 18, 2020, 6:24 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Can,

On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 14:20 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2020-12-16 21:16, Stanley Chu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This series cleans up and refactors clk-scaling feature, and shall not
> > change any functionality.
> > 
> > This series is based on Can's series "Three changes related with UFS
> > clock scaling" in 5.10/scsi-fixes branch in Martin's tree.
> > 
> 
> Hi Stanley,
> 
> Thanks for noticing my changes, will you review them?
> I see customers manipulte UFS scaling related sysfs
> nodes more often than before, so we may want to fix it asap.

I have gave my review tag in all patches in this series : )

Thanks,
Stanley Chu

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Can Guo.
> 
> > However this series may not be required to be merged to 5.10. The
> > choice of base branch is simply making these patches easy to be
> > reviewed because this series is based on clk-scaling fixes by Can. If
> > this series is decided not being merged to 5.10, then I would rebase
> > it to 5.11/scsi-queue.
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> >   - Refactor ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend() in patch [3/4]
> >   - Change function name from ufshcd_clk_scaling_pm() to
> > ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend() in patch [3/4]
> >   - Refine patch titles
> > 
> > Stanley Chu (4):
> >   scsi: ufs: Refactor cancelling clkscaling works
> >   scsi: ufs: Remove redundant null checking of devfreq instance
> >   scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clk-scaling feature
> >   scsi: ufs: Fix build warning by incorrect function description
> > 
> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
Martin K. Petersen Jan. 6, 2021, 2:47 a.m. UTC | #2
Stanley,

> However this series may not be required to be merged to 5.10. The
> choice of base branch is simply making these patches easy to be
> reviewed because this series is based on clk-scaling fixes by Can.

Please redo your series on top of 5.12/scsi-queue + Can's changes.

Thanks!