Message ID | 20210302101211.2328-1-mark.rutland@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: Support FIQ controller registration | expand |
On 02/03/2021 19.12, Mark Rutland wrote: > I'm hoping that we can get the first 2 patches in as a preparatory cleanup for > the next rc or so, and then the rest of the series can be rebased atop that. > I've pushed the series out to my arm64/fiq branch [4] on kernel.org, also > tagged as arm64-fiq-20210302, atop v5.12-rc1. Just a reminder to everyone that filesystems under v5.12-rc1 go explodey if you use a swap file [1]. I don't care for the M1 bring-up series (we don't *have* storage), but it's worth pointing out for other people who might test this. Modulo that, Tested-by: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjnzdLSP3oDxhf9eMTYo7GF-QjaNLBUH1Zk3c4A7X75YA@mail.gmail.com/
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:08:50PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote: > On 02/03/2021 19.12, Mark Rutland wrote: > > I'm hoping that we can get the first 2 patches in as a preparatory cleanup for > > the next rc or so, and then the rest of the series can be rebased atop that. > > I've pushed the series out to my arm64/fiq branch [4] on kernel.org, also > > tagged as arm64-fiq-20210302, atop v5.12-rc1. > > Just a reminder to everyone that filesystems under v5.12-rc1 go explodey if > you use a swap file [1]. > > I don't care for the M1 bring-up series (we don't *have* storage), but it's > worth pointing out for other people who might test this. > > Modulo that, > > Tested-by: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjnzdLSP3oDxhf9eMTYo7GF-QjaNLBUH1Zk3c4A7X75YA@mail.gmail.com/ Thanks! I've folded that in, with the series rebased to v5.12-rc2, tagged as arm64-fiq-20210308. I'm expecting that Marc will get the first couple of patches queued by rc4, so there's at least one rebase ahead. Mark.
On Mon, 08 Mar 2021 17:52:32 +0000, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:08:50PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote: > > On 02/03/2021 19.12, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > I'm hoping that we can get the first 2 patches in as a preparatory cleanup for > > > the next rc or so, and then the rest of the series can be rebased atop that. > > > I've pushed the series out to my arm64/fiq branch [4] on kernel.org, also > > > tagged as arm64-fiq-20210302, atop v5.12-rc1. > > > > Just a reminder to everyone that filesystems under v5.12-rc1 go explodey if > > you use a swap file [1]. > > > > I don't care for the M1 bring-up series (we don't *have* storage), but it's > > worth pointing out for other people who might test this. > > > > Modulo that, > > > > Tested-by: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st> > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjnzdLSP3oDxhf9eMTYo7GF-QjaNLBUH1Zk3c4A7X75YA@mail.gmail.com/ > > Thanks! > > I've folded that in, with the series rebased to v5.12-rc2, tagged as > arm64-fiq-20210308. I'm expecting that Marc will get the first couple of > patches queued by rc4, so there's at least one rebase ahead. Just pushed those two into -next, and planning to send them to tglx by the end of the week. Thanks, M.