Message ID | 20220111174337.223320-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mfd/power/regulators: dt-bindings: max14577: convert to dtschema | expand |
On 11/01/2022 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi, > > Changes since v1 > ================ > 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas > 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties, > additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and > current, don't use patternProperties when not needed. > > Dependencies > ============ > 1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic > checker won't complain about DTS. > I will take it via Samsung SoC tree. > > 2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last > patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree. > Dear Lee, This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could you pick up patches 2-4 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 11/01/2022 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Changes since v1 > > ================ > > 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas > > 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties, > > additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and > > current, don't use patternProperties when not needed. > > > > Dependencies > > ============ > > 1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic > > checker won't complain about DTS. > > I will take it via Samsung SoC tree. > > > > 2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last > > patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree. > > > Dear Lee, > > This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could > you pick up patches 2-4 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree? Nothing from Mark?
On 07/02/2022 10:34, Lee Jones wrote: > On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 11/01/2022 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Changes since v1 >>> ================ >>> 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas >>> 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties, >>> additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and >>> current, don't use patternProperties when not needed. >>> >>> Dependencies >>> ============ >>> 1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic >>> checker won't complain about DTS. >>> I will take it via Samsung SoC tree. >>> >>> 2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last >>> patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree. >>> >> Dear Lee, >> >> This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could >> you pick up patches 2-4 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree? > > Nothing from Mark? No, nothing. There is no other simultaneous work on these files, so I don't expect conflicts here. Important part is that I got review from Rob. If lack of ack makes you hesitant, I can resend hoping it will help but it is a bit of pain. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Mon, 07 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 07/02/2022 10:34, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > >> On 11/01/2022 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Changes since v1 > >>> ================ > >>> 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas > >>> 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties, > >>> additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and > >>> current, don't use patternProperties when not needed. > >>> > >>> Dependencies > >>> ============ > >>> 1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic > >>> checker won't complain about DTS. > >>> I will take it via Samsung SoC tree. > >>> > >>> 2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last > >>> patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree. > >>> > >> Dear Lee, > >> > >> This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could > >> you pick up patches 2-4 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree? > > > > Nothing from Mark? > > No, nothing. There is no other simultaneous work on these files, so I > don't expect conflicts here. Important part is that I got review from Rob. > > If lack of ack makes you hesitant, I can resend hoping it will help but > it is a bit of pain. No need. I'll ping Mark privately to de-conflict.