mbox series

[v2,0/4] mfd/power/regulators: dt-bindings: max14577: convert to dtschema

Message ID 20220111174337.223320-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series mfd/power/regulators: dt-bindings: max14577: convert to dtschema | expand

Message

Krzysztof Kozlowski Jan. 11, 2022, 5:43 p.m. UTC
Hi,

Changes since v1
================
1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas
2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
   additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
   current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.

Dependencies
============
1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
   checker won't complain about DTS.
   I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.

2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last
   patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Krzysztof Kozlowski (4):
  ARM: dts: exynos: Align MAX77836 nodes with dtschema on Monk and
    Rinato
  dt-bindings: power: supply: maxim,max14577: convert to dtschema
  regulator: dt-bindings: maxim,max14577: convert to dtschema
  dt-bindings: mfd: maxim,max14577: convert to dtschema

 .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/max14577.txt      | 147 -------------
 .../bindings/mfd/maxim,max14577.yaml          | 195 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../bindings/power/supply/maxim,max14577.yaml |  84 ++++++++
 .../bindings/regulator/maxim,max14577.yaml    |  92 +++++++++
 MAINTAINERS                                   |   3 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts         |   2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts       |   2 +-
 7 files changed, 375 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max14577.txt
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max14577.yaml
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/maxim,max14577.yaml
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/maxim,max14577.yaml

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Feb. 6, 2022, 5:39 p.m. UTC | #1
On 11/01/2022 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Changes since v1
> ================
> 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas
> 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
>    additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
>    current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.
> 
> Dependencies
> ============
> 1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
>    checker won't complain about DTS.
>    I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.
> 
> 2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last
>    patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree.
> 
Dear Lee,

This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could
you pick up patches 2-4 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree?

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Lee Jones Feb. 7, 2022, 9:34 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On 11/01/2022 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Changes since v1
> > ================
> > 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas
> > 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
> >    additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
> >    current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.
> > 
> > Dependencies
> > ============
> > 1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
> >    checker won't complain about DTS.
> >    I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.
> > 
> > 2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last
> >    patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree.
> > 
> Dear Lee,
> 
> This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could
> you pick up patches 2-4 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree?

Nothing from Mark?
Krzysztof Kozlowski Feb. 7, 2022, 9:43 a.m. UTC | #3
On 07/02/2022 10:34, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
>> On 11/01/2022 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Changes since v1
>>> ================
>>> 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas
>>> 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
>>>    additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
>>>    current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.
>>>
>>> Dependencies
>>> ============
>>> 1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
>>>    checker won't complain about DTS.
>>>    I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.
>>>
>>> 2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last
>>>    patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree.
>>>
>> Dear Lee,
>>
>> This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could
>> you pick up patches 2-4 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree?
> 
> Nothing from Mark?

No, nothing. There is no other simultaneous work on these files, so I
don't expect conflicts here. Important part is that I got review from Rob.

If lack of ack makes you hesitant, I can resend hoping it will help but
it is a bit of pain.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Lee Jones Feb. 7, 2022, 10:11 a.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, 07 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On 07/02/2022 10:34, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 
> >> On 11/01/2022 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v1
> >>> ================
> >>> 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas
> >>> 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
> >>>    additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
> >>>    current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.
> >>>
> >>> Dependencies
> >>> ============
> >>> 1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
> >>>    checker won't complain about DTS.
> >>>    I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.
> >>>
> >>> 2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last
> >>>    patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree.
> >>>
> >> Dear Lee,
> >>
> >> This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could
> >> you pick up patches 2-4 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree?
> > 
> > Nothing from Mark?
> 
> No, nothing. There is no other simultaneous work on these files, so I
> don't expect conflicts here. Important part is that I got review from Rob.
> 
> If lack of ack makes you hesitant, I can resend hoping it will help but
> it is a bit of pain.

No need.  I'll ping Mark privately to de-conflict.