| Message ID | 20231115092805.737822-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | drivers: perf: arm_pmu: Drop 'pmu_lock' element from 'struct pmu_hw_events' | expand |
On 11/15/23 14:58, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This series drops 'pmu_lock' usage from all arm platforms which had already > been dropped from arm64 platforms earlier via the following commit. > > commit 2a0e2a02e4b7 ("arm64: perf: Remove PMU locking"). > > Afterwards, drop unused 'pmu_lock' element from 'struct pmu_hw_events'. The > series applies on 6.7-rc1 and has been tested on arm64. Although just build > tested for arm platform. > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> > Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > Changes in V1: > > - Added some build warning fixes Hello Will/Mark, Any updates or concerns on this series ? - Anshuman
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:59:49AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > On 11/15/23 14:58, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > This series drops 'pmu_lock' usage from all arm platforms which had already > > been dropped from arm64 platforms earlier via the following commit. > > > > commit 2a0e2a02e4b7 ("arm64: perf: Remove PMU locking"). > > > > Afterwards, drop unused 'pmu_lock' element from 'struct pmu_hw_events'. The > > series applies on 6.7-rc1 and has been tested on arm64. Although just build > > tested for arm platform. > > > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > > Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> > > Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > > > Changes in V1: > > > > - Added some build warning fixes > > Hello Will/Mark, > > Any updates or concerns on this series ? The changes themselves look good to me. I'd like to tweak the commit message for the first patch (and I've given specific wording that we can use). Will, are you happy to fold that in when applying, or would you prefer that Anshuman sends a v2? Mark.
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:58:03 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This series drops 'pmu_lock' usage from all arm platforms which had already > been dropped from arm64 platforms earlier via the following commit. > > commit 2a0e2a02e4b7 ("arm64: perf: Remove PMU locking"). > > Afterwards, drop unused 'pmu_lock' element from 'struct pmu_hw_events'. The > series applies on 6.7-rc1 and has been tested on arm64. Although just build > tested for arm platform. > > [...] Applied to will (for-next/perf), thanks! [1/2] arm: perf: Remove PMU locking https://git.kernel.org/will/c/5cd7da19cb97 [2/2] drivers: perf: arm_pmu: Drop 'pmu_lock' element from 'struct pmu_hw_events' https://git.kernel.org/will/c/118eb89b1e7f Cheers,
This series drops 'pmu_lock' usage from all arm platforms which had already been dropped from arm64 platforms earlier via the following commit. commit 2a0e2a02e4b7 ("arm64: perf: Remove PMU locking"). Afterwards, drop unused 'pmu_lock' element from 'struct pmu_hw_events'. The series applies on 6.7-rc1 and has been tested on arm64. Although just build tested for arm platform. Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Changes in V1: - Added some build warning fixes RFC V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231016052431.1390269-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ Anshuman Khandual (2): arm: perf: Remove PMU locking drivers: perf: arm_pmu: Drop 'pmu_lock' element from 'struct pmu_hw_events' arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c | 28 ++++-------------- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 44 ----------------------------- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c | 44 ++++++----------------------- drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 1 - include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 6 ---- 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)