Message ID | 20231219231040.2459358-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | StarFive DWMAC support for JH7100 | expand |
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 01:10:38AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > This is just a subset of the initial patch series [1] adding networking > support for StarFive JH7100 SoC. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231218214451.2345691-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/ You need to send the binding patch alongside the driver, unless that has been applied already. Cheers, Conor.
On 12/20/23 01:48, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 01:10:38AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: >> This is just a subset of the initial patch series [1] adding networking >> support for StarFive JH7100 SoC. >> >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231218214451.2345691-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/ > > You need to send the binding patch alongside the driver, unless that has > been applied already. Yeah, I wasn't sure about that, that's why I initially asked in [1] for a confirmation regarding the split. I chose to keep the binding in the same set with the dts patches because the driver is just a glue layer and doesn't really depend on bindings changes. Should I still provide it here? I was about to submit the remaining patch set, so it would be great if we could clarify this beforehand. Thanks for noticing the potential issue, Cristian [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0451e5a9-0cfb-42a5-b74b-2012e2c0d326@collabora.com/
On 12/20/23 01:58, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > On 12/20/23 01:48, Conor Dooley wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 01:10:38AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: >>> This is just a subset of the initial patch series [1] adding networking >>> support for StarFive JH7100 SoC. >>> >>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231218214451.2345691-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/ >> >> You need to send the binding patch alongside the driver, unless that has >> been applied already. You are right, the binding should stay with the driver as it provides the top-level compatibles. I was wrongly thinking on the base snps,dwmac only. > Yeah, I wasn't sure about that, that's why I initially asked in [1] for > a confirmation regarding the split. I chose to keep the binding in the > same set with the dts patches because the driver is just a glue layer > and doesn't really depend on bindings changes. > > Should I still provide it here? I was about to submit the remaining > patch set, so it would be great if we could clarify this beforehand. > > Thanks for noticing the potential issue, > Cristian > > [1]: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0451e5a9-0cfb-42a5-b74b-2012e2c0d326@collabora.com/ > >