Message ID | 20240610085735.147134-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | MediaTek DVFSRC Bus Bandwidth and Regulator knobs | expand |
On 10.06.24 11:57, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Changes in v6: > - Fixed build with clang (thanks Nathan!) > - Removed unused mtk_rmw() macro in mtk-dvfsrc.c > - Added MODULE_DESCRIPTION() to mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c > [..] > > AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (7): > dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators > dt-bindings: interconnect: Add MediaTek EMI Interconnect bindings > dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195 > soc: mediatek: Add MediaTek DVFS Resource Collector (DVFSRC) driver > regulator: Remove mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c > regulator: Add refactored mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver > interconnect: mediatek: Add MediaTek MT8183/8195 EMI Interconnect > driver Thanks Angelo! I have picked patches 2 and 7. Patch 2 is also available in my icc-mtk stable branch. Feel free to pull it to resolve the schema dependency for patch 3. BR, Georgi > > .../interconnect/mediatek,mt8183-emi.yaml | 51 ++ > .../mediatek,mt6873-dvfsrc-regulator.yaml | 43 ++ > .../soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml | 83 +++ > drivers/interconnect/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/interconnect/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Kconfig | 29 + > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Makefile | 5 + > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.c | 153 +++++ > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.h | 40 ++ > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8183.c | 143 +++++ > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8195.c | 339 +++++++++++ > drivers/regulator/mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c | 248 ++++---- > drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 11 + > drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-dvfsrc.c | 545 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../interconnect/mediatek,mt8183.h | 23 + > .../interconnect/mediatek,mt8195.h | 44 ++ > include/linux/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.h | 36 ++ > include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_sip_svc.h | 3 + > 19 files changed, 1666 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/mediatek,mt8183-emi.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mediatek,mt6873-dvfsrc-regulator.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.c > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.h > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8183.c > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8195.c > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-dvfsrc.c > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interconnect/mediatek,mt8183.h > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interconnect/mediatek,mt8195.h > create mode 100644 include/linux/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.h >
Il 13/06/24 14:38, Georgi Djakov ha scritto: > On 10.06.24 11:57, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Changes in v6: >> - Fixed build with clang (thanks Nathan!) >> - Removed unused mtk_rmw() macro in mtk-dvfsrc.c >> - Added MODULE_DESCRIPTION() to mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c >> > [..] >> >> AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (7): >> dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators >> dt-bindings: interconnect: Add MediaTek EMI Interconnect bindings >> dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195 >> soc: mediatek: Add MediaTek DVFS Resource Collector (DVFSRC) driver >> regulator: Remove mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c >> regulator: Add refactored mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver >> interconnect: mediatek: Add MediaTek MT8183/8195 EMI Interconnect >> driver > > Thanks Angelo! I have picked patches 2 and 7. Patch 2 is also available > in my icc-mtk stable branch. Feel free to pull it to resolve the schema > dependency for patch 3. > Thank you Georgi! I have to wait until Mark takes the regulator bindings and commits, then I will be able to pick the soc bindings and driver. :-) Cheers, Angelo > BR, > Georgi > >> >> .../interconnect/mediatek,mt8183-emi.yaml | 51 ++ >> .../mediatek,mt6873-dvfsrc-regulator.yaml | 43 ++ >> .../soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml | 83 +++ >> drivers/interconnect/Kconfig | 1 + >> drivers/interconnect/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Kconfig | 29 + >> drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Makefile | 5 + >> drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.c | 153 +++++ >> drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.h | 40 ++ >> drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8183.c | 143 +++++ >> drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8195.c | 339 +++++++++++ >> drivers/regulator/mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c | 248 ++++---- >> drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 11 + >> drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-dvfsrc.c | 545 ++++++++++++++++++ >> .../interconnect/mediatek,mt8183.h | 23 + >> .../interconnect/mediatek,mt8195.h | 44 ++ >> include/linux/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.h | 36 ++ >> include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_sip_svc.h | 3 + >> 19 files changed, 1666 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/mediatek,mt8183-emi.yaml >> create mode 100644 >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mediatek,mt6873-dvfsrc-regulator.yaml >> create mode 100644 >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml >> create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Kconfig >> create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Makefile >> create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.h >> create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8183.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8195.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-dvfsrc.c >> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interconnect/mediatek,mt8183.h >> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interconnect/mediatek,mt8195.h >> create mode 100644 include/linux/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.h >> >
Il 10/06/24 10:57, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto: > Changes in v6: > - Fixed build with clang (thanks Nathan!) > - Removed unused mtk_rmw() macro in mtk-dvfsrc.c > - Added MODULE_DESCRIPTION() to mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c > ... > > AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (7): > dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators Mark, I assume that this series is ok from your perspective, since this has got your acks and r-b -- but in order to pick the soc/mediatek stuff I need all of the dependent bindings to be in as well .. and this includes the regulator one! The main issue here is that the main soc/mediatek dvfsrc binding dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195 does use the others, so I can't pick this one without the others being present or the validation obviously fails. So... gentle ping :-) Thanks, Angelo > dt-bindings: interconnect: Add MediaTek EMI Interconnect bindings > dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195 > soc: mediatek: Add MediaTek DVFS Resource Collector (DVFSRC) driver > regulator: Remove mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c > regulator: Add refactored mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver > interconnect: mediatek: Add MediaTek MT8183/8195 EMI Interconnect > driver > > .../interconnect/mediatek,mt8183-emi.yaml | 51 ++ > .../mediatek,mt6873-dvfsrc-regulator.yaml | 43 ++ > .../soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml | 83 +++ > drivers/interconnect/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/interconnect/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Kconfig | 29 + > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Makefile | 5 + > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.c | 153 +++++ > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.h | 40 ++ > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8183.c | 143 +++++ > drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8195.c | 339 +++++++++++ > drivers/regulator/mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c | 248 ++++---- > drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 11 + > drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-dvfsrc.c | 545 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../interconnect/mediatek,mt8183.h | 23 + > .../interconnect/mediatek,mt8195.h | 44 ++ > include/linux/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.h | 36 ++ > include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_sip_svc.h | 3 + > 19 files changed, 1666 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/mediatek,mt8183-emi.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mediatek,mt6873-dvfsrc-regulator.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.c > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/icc-emi.h > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8183.c > create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/mediatek/mt8195.c > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-dvfsrc.c > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interconnect/mediatek,mt8183.h > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interconnect/mediatek,mt8195.h > create mode 100644 include/linux/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.h >
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32:30AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Mark, I assume that this series is ok from your perspective, since this has got > your acks and r-b -- but in order to pick the soc/mediatek stuff I need all of > the dependent bindings to be in as well .. and this includes the regulator one! > > The main issue here is that the main soc/mediatek dvfsrc binding > dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195 > does use the others, so I can't pick this one without the others being present > or the validation obviously fails. > > So... gentle ping :-) I can't tell what you want from me here.
Il 25/06/24 12:25, Mark Brown ha scritto: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32:30AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > >> Mark, I assume that this series is ok from your perspective, since this has got >> your acks and r-b -- but in order to pick the soc/mediatek stuff I need all of >> the dependent bindings to be in as well .. and this includes the regulator one! >> >> The main issue here is that the main soc/mediatek dvfsrc binding >> dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195 >> does use the others, so I can't pick this one without the others being present >> or the validation obviously fails. >> >> So... gentle ping :-) > > I can't tell what you want from me here. I'm asking you to pick the regulator patches :-) dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators regulator: Remove mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c regulator: Add refactored mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver ^^^ These ones.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 01:58:57PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 25/06/24 12:25, Mark Brown ha scritto: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32:30AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > > > The main issue here is that the main soc/mediatek dvfsrc binding > > > dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195 > > > does use the others, so I can't pick this one without the others being present > > > or the validation obviously fails. > > I can't tell what you want from me here. > I'm asking you to pick the regulator patches :-) > dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators > regulator: Remove mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c > regulator: Add refactored mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver Is there no interdependency with the rest of the series? There was in some earlier version at least I think. If I reviewed the patches it's because I wasn't expecting to apply them.
Il 25/06/24 14:50, Mark Brown ha scritto: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 01:58:57PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 25/06/24 12:25, Mark Brown ha scritto: >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32:30AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > >>>> The main issue here is that the main soc/mediatek dvfsrc binding >>>> dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195 >>>> does use the others, so I can't pick this one without the others being present >>>> or the validation obviously fails. > >>> I can't tell what you want from me here. > >> I'm asking you to pick the regulator patches :-) > >> dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators >> regulator: Remove mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c >> regulator: Add refactored mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver > > Is there no interdependency with the rest of the series? There was in > some earlier version at least I think. If I reviewed the patches it's > because I wasn't expecting to apply them. The interdependency is for soc/mediatek commits, which depend on: - Interconnect commits (which Georgi picked already); and - Regulator commits And... you reviewed the patch in the previous merge window :-) Cheers
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 04:51:56PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > The interdependency is for soc/mediatek commits, which depend on: > - Interconnect commits (which Georgi picked already); and > - Regulator commits So the regulator stuff works without the interconnect and vice versa, no build deps or anything? > And... you reviewed the patch in the previous merge window :-) I simply don't provide tags for things I expect to go via my tree.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:57:28 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Changes in v6: > - Fixed build with clang (thanks Nathan!) > - Removed unused mtk_rmw() macro in mtk-dvfsrc.c > - Added MODULE_DESCRIPTION() to mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c > > Changes in v5: > - Fixed Kconfig dependencies in interconnect > - Fixed module build for dvfsrc and interconnect > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next Thanks! [1/7] dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators commit: b147ae7ae5141cb10c520d372ecabb2c520210c4 [5/7] regulator: Remove mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c commit: cd102850e32c145661c6a0640dc6c5feba11af72 [6/7] regulator: Add refactored mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver commit: d2ea920a4092b3c0a6a004b93ce198ca37455d90 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
Il 25/06/24 20:47, Mark Brown ha scritto: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:57:28 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Changes in v6: >> - Fixed build with clang (thanks Nathan!) >> - Removed unused mtk_rmw() macro in mtk-dvfsrc.c >> - Added MODULE_DESCRIPTION() to mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c >> >> Changes in v5: >> - Fixed Kconfig dependencies in interconnect >> - Fixed module build for dvfsrc and interconnect >> >> [...] > > Applied to > Thanks Mark, appreciated :-) Cheers > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next > > Thanks! > > [1/7] dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators > commit: b147ae7ae5141cb10c520d372ecabb2c520210c4 > [5/7] regulator: Remove mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c > commit: cd102850e32c145661c6a0640dc6c5feba11af72 > [6/7] regulator: Add refactored mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver > commit: d2ea920a4092b3c0a6a004b93ce198ca37455d90 > > All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next > tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during > the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if > problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. > > You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing > and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and > send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. > > If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they > should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing > patches will not be replaced. > > Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying > to this mail. > > Thanks, > Mark >
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:57 AM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote: > > Changes in v6: > - Fixed build with clang (thanks Nathan!) > - Removed unused mtk_rmw() macro in mtk-dvfsrc.c > - Added MODULE_DESCRIPTION() to mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c > > Changes in v5: > - Fixed Kconfig dependencies in interconnect > - Fixed module build for dvfsrc and interconnect > > Changes in v4: > - Updated patch [3/7] to actually remove address/size cells > as the old version got unexpectedly pushed in v3. > > Changes in v3: > - Removed examples from interconnect and regulator bindings > and kept example node with interconnect and regulator in > the main DVFSRC binding as suggested > - Removed 'reg' from interconnect and regulator, removed both > address and size cells from the main DVFSRC binding as that > was not really needed > - Added anyOf-required entries in the regulator binding as it > doesn't make sense to probe it without any regulator subnode > > Changes in v2: > - Fixed issues with regulator binding about useless quotes and > wrong binding path (oops) > - Removed useless 'items' from DVFSRC main binding > - Allowed address/size cells to DVFSRC main binding to resolve > validation issues on the regulator and interconnect bindings > - Changed dvfsrc node name to `system-controller`, as the DVFSRC > is actually able to control multiple system components. > - Added a commit to remove mtk-dvfs-regulator.c before adding the > new, refactored regulator driver > > > This series adds support for the MediaTek Dynamic Voltage and Frequency > Scaling Resource Controller (DVFSRC), found on many MediaTek SoCs. > > This hardware collects requests from both software and the various remote > processors embededd into the SoC, and decides about a minimum operating > voltage and a minimum DRAM frequency to fulfill those requests, in an > effort to provide the best achievable performance per watt. > > Such hardware IP is capable of transparently performing direct register > R/W on all of the DVFSRC-controlled regulators and SoC bandwidth knobs. > > Summarizing how the DVFSRC works for Interconnect: > > ICC provider ICC Nodes > ---- ---- > _________ |CPU | |--- |VPU | > _____ | |----- ---- | ---- > | |->| DRAM | ---- | ---- > |DRAM |->|scheduler|----- |GPU | |--- |DISP| > | |->| (EMI) | ---- | ---- > |_____|->|_________|---. ----- | ---- > /|\ `-|MMSYS|--|--- |VDEC| > | ----- | ---- > | | ---- > | change DRAM freq |--- |VENC| > -------- | ---- > SMC --> | DVFSRC | | ---- > -------- |--- |IMG | > | ---- > | ---- > |--- |CAM | > ---- > > ...and for regulators, it's simply... > SMC -> DVFSRC -> Regulator voltage decider -> (vreg) Registers R/W > > Please note that this series is based on an old (abandoned) series from > MediaTek [1], and reuses some parts of the code found in that. > > Besides, included in this series, there's also a refactoring of the > mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver, which never got compiled at all, and would > not build anyway because of missing headers and typos: that commit did > not get any Fixes tag because, well, backporting makes no sense at all > as the DVFSRC support - which is critical for that driver to work - is > introduced with *this series*! :-) > > P.S.: The DVFSRC regulator is a requirement for the MediaTek UFSHCI > controller's crypto boost feature, which is already upstream but > lacking the actual regulator to work....... :-) > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210812085846.2628-1-dawei.chien@mediatek.com/ > > AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (7): > dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators > dt-bindings: interconnect: Add MediaTek EMI Interconnect bindings > dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195 > soc: mediatek: Add MediaTek DVFS Resource Collector (DVFSRC) driver Looks like the driver got picked up, but not the binding. mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc and mediatek,mt8195-dvfsrc show up in next as undocumented. Rob
Il 12/10/24 00:15, Rob Herring ha scritto: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:57 AM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote: >> >> Changes in v6: >> - Fixed build with clang (thanks Nathan!) >> - Removed unused mtk_rmw() macro in mtk-dvfsrc.c >> - Added MODULE_DESCRIPTION() to mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c >> >> Changes in v5: >> - Fixed Kconfig dependencies in interconnect >> - Fixed module build for dvfsrc and interconnect >> >> Changes in v4: >> - Updated patch [3/7] to actually remove address/size cells >> as the old version got unexpectedly pushed in v3. >> >> Changes in v3: >> - Removed examples from interconnect and regulator bindings >> and kept example node with interconnect and regulator in >> the main DVFSRC binding as suggested >> - Removed 'reg' from interconnect and regulator, removed both >> address and size cells from the main DVFSRC binding as that >> was not really needed >> - Added anyOf-required entries in the regulator binding as it >> doesn't make sense to probe it without any regulator subnode >> >> Changes in v2: >> - Fixed issues with regulator binding about useless quotes and >> wrong binding path (oops) >> - Removed useless 'items' from DVFSRC main binding >> - Allowed address/size cells to DVFSRC main binding to resolve >> validation issues on the regulator and interconnect bindings >> - Changed dvfsrc node name to `system-controller`, as the DVFSRC >> is actually able to control multiple system components. >> - Added a commit to remove mtk-dvfs-regulator.c before adding the >> new, refactored regulator driver >> >> >> This series adds support for the MediaTek Dynamic Voltage and Frequency >> Scaling Resource Controller (DVFSRC), found on many MediaTek SoCs. >> >> This hardware collects requests from both software and the various remote >> processors embededd into the SoC, and decides about a minimum operating >> voltage and a minimum DRAM frequency to fulfill those requests, in an >> effort to provide the best achievable performance per watt. >> >> Such hardware IP is capable of transparently performing direct register >> R/W on all of the DVFSRC-controlled regulators and SoC bandwidth knobs. >> >> Summarizing how the DVFSRC works for Interconnect: >> >> ICC provider ICC Nodes >> ---- ---- >> _________ |CPU | |--- |VPU | >> _____ | |----- ---- | ---- >> | |->| DRAM | ---- | ---- >> |DRAM |->|scheduler|----- |GPU | |--- |DISP| >> | |->| (EMI) | ---- | ---- >> |_____|->|_________|---. ----- | ---- >> /|\ `-|MMSYS|--|--- |VDEC| >> | ----- | ---- >> | | ---- >> | change DRAM freq |--- |VENC| >> -------- | ---- >> SMC --> | DVFSRC | | ---- >> -------- |--- |IMG | >> | ---- >> | ---- >> |--- |CAM | >> ---- >> >> ...and for regulators, it's simply... >> SMC -> DVFSRC -> Regulator voltage decider -> (vreg) Registers R/W >> >> Please note that this series is based on an old (abandoned) series from >> MediaTek [1], and reuses some parts of the code found in that. >> >> Besides, included in this series, there's also a refactoring of the >> mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver, which never got compiled at all, and would >> not build anyway because of missing headers and typos: that commit did >> not get any Fixes tag because, well, backporting makes no sense at all >> as the DVFSRC support - which is critical for that driver to work - is >> introduced with *this series*! :-) >> >> P.S.: The DVFSRC regulator is a requirement for the MediaTek UFSHCI >> controller's crypto boost feature, which is already upstream but >> lacking the actual regulator to work....... :-) >> >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210812085846.2628-1-dawei.chien@mediatek.com/ >> >> AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (7): >> dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators >> dt-bindings: interconnect: Add MediaTek EMI Interconnect bindings >> dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195 >> soc: mediatek: Add MediaTek DVFS Resource Collector (DVFSRC) driver > > Looks like the driver got picked up, but not the binding. > mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc and mediatek,mt8195-dvfsrc show up in next as > undocumented. > Thanks for making me notice. Adding it up right now. Cheers, Angelo