Message ID | 20240730133318.1573765-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Make SCMI transport as standalone drivers | expand |
> Subject: [PATCH v3 0/9] Make SCMI transport as standalone drivers > > Hi all, > > Till now the SCMI transport layer was being built embedded into in the > core SCMI stack. > > Some of these transports, despite being currently part of the main > SCMI module, are indeed also registered with different subsystems like > optee or virtio, and actively probed also by those: this led to a few > awkward and convoluted tricks to properly handle such interactions at > boot time in the SCMI stack. > > Moreover some partner expressed the desire to be able to fully > modularize the transports components. > > This series aim to make all such transports as standalone drivers that > can be optionally loaded as modules. > > In order to do this, at first some new mechanism is introduced to > support this new capability while maintaining, in parallel, the old > legacy embedded transports; then each transport, one by one, is > transitioned to be a standalone driver and finally the old legacy > support for embedded transport is removed. > > Patch [1/9] is a fix around the chan_free method for OPTEE transport; it > is really unrelated to this series, but included to avoid conflicts. > > Patch [2/9] is a mostly unrelated (but much needed) clean-up from > Peng, which I included in this series to avoid conflicts at merge. > > Patch [3/9] simply collects the existing datagram manipulation helpers > in a pair of function pointers structures, in preparation for later reworks. > > Patch [4/9] adds the bulk of the new logic to the core SCMI stack and > then each existing transport is transitioned to be a standalone driver in > patches 5,6,7,8 while shuffling around the compatibles. (no DT change > is needed of curse for backward compatibility) While doing this I kept > the module authorship in line with the main > author(S) as spitted out by git-blame. > > Finally patch [9/9] removes all the legacy dead code from the core > SCMI stack. > > No new symbol EXPORT has been added. > > The new transport drivers have been tested, as built-in and LKM, as > follows: > > - mailbox on JUNO > - virtio on emulation > - optee on QEMU/optee using Linaro setup > > Exercised using the regular SCMI drivers stack and the SCMI ACS suite, > testing commands, replies, delayed responses and notification. > > Multiple virtual SCMI instances support has been tested too. > > SMC has NOT been tested/exercised at run-time, only compile-tested. > (due to lack of hardware) > > Note that in this new setup, all the probe deferral and retries between > the SCMI core stack and the transports has been removed, since no > more needed. > > Moreover the new drivers have been tested also with a fully > modularized SCMI stack, i.e.: > > scmi-core.ko + scmi-module.ko + scmi_transport_*.ko [ + vendor > modules ] > > Based on v6.11-rc1 > > Any feedback, and especially testing (:D) is welcome. For the patchset, Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> #i.MX95 19x19 EVK Regards, Peng. > > Thanks, > Cristian > > --- > v2 --> v3 > - rebased on v6.11-rc1 > - fixed spacing in Kconfig > - fixed Copyrights all over > - fixed platform_driver_register callsite in OPTEE transport > - refactored DEFINE_SCMI_TRANSPORT_DRIVER() to: > + use alloc + add_data + add platform drivers methods so as to > implictly > use a standard default device_release method. > + drop .remove method in favour of devres_add_action_or_reset > + use explicit parameter passing (no more concatenation) > - renamed scmi_transport_lookup() to scmi_transport_setup() > - use IOMEM_ERR_PTR to avoid sparse issues > > v1 --> v2 > - fixed setup_shmem_iomap to address also SMC needs (QC/nikunj) > (silencing also warnings by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>) > - using __free OF cleanup.h magic in setup_shmme_iomap > - properly handle platform_driver_register() failures (Dan) > - fixed a few commit message style > - added a few missing static in scmi_desc > (addresses warnings by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>) > > > Cristian Marussi (8): > firmware: arm_scmi: Fix double free in OPTEE transport > firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce packet handling helpers > firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for standalone transport drivers > firmware: arm_scmi: Make MBOX transport a standalone driver > firmware: arm_scmi: Make SMC transport a standalone driver > firmware: arm_scmi: Make OPTEE transport a standalone driver > firmware: arm_scmi: Make VirtIO transport a standalone driver > firmware: arm_scmi: Remove legacy transport-layer code > > Peng Fan (1): > firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce setup_shmem_iomap > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig | 20 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 9 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 184 +++++++++++++---- > - > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 142 +++++--------- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/msg.c | 32 ++- > .../{mailbox.c => scmi_transport_mailbox.c} | 72 +++---- > .../{optee.c => scmi_transport_optee.c} | 130 ++++++------- > .../arm_scmi/{smc.c => scmi_transport_smc.c} | 57 +++--- > .../{virtio.c => scmi_transport_virtio.c} | 102 +++++----- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c | 85 ++++++-- > 10 files changed, 477 insertions(+), 356 deletions(-) rename > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{mailbox.c => scmi_transport_mailbox.c} > (86%) rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{optee.c => > scmi_transport_optee.c} (89%) rename > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{smc.c => scmi_transport_smc.c} (87%) > rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{virtio.c => scmi_transport_virtio.c} > (94%) > > -- > 2.45.2 >
On 7/30/2024 6:33 AM, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Hi all, > > Till now the SCMI transport layer was being built embedded into in the core > SCMI stack. > > Some of these transports, despite being currently part of the main SCMI > module, are indeed also registered with different subsystems like optee or > virtio, and actively probed also by those: this led to a few awkward and > convoluted tricks to properly handle such interactions at boot time in the > SCMI stack. > > Moreover some partner expressed the desire to be able to fully modularize > the transports components. > > This series aim to make all such transports as standalone drivers that can > be optionally loaded as modules. > > In order to do this, at first some new mechanism is introduced to support > this new capability while maintaining, in parallel, the old legacy embedded > transports; then each transport, one by one, is transitioned to be a > standalone driver and finally the old legacy support for embedded transport > is removed. > > Patch [1/9] is a fix around the chan_free method for OPTEE transport; it is > really unrelated to this series, but included to avoid conflicts. > > Patch [2/9] is a mostly unrelated (but much needed) clean-up from Peng, > which I included in this series to avoid conflicts at merge. > > Patch [3/9] simply collects the existing datagram manipulation helpers in a > pair of function pointers structures, in preparation for later reworks. > > Patch [4/9] adds the bulk of the new logic to the core SCMI stack and then > each existing transport is transitioned to be a standalone driver in > patches 5,6,7,8 while shuffling around the compatibles. (no DT change is > needed of curse for backward compatibility) > While doing this I kept the module authorship in line with the main > author(S) as spitted out by git-blame. > > Finally patch [9/9] removes all the legacy dead code from the core SCMI > stack. > > No new symbol EXPORT has been added. > > The new transport drivers have been tested, as built-in and LKM, as > follows: > > - mailbox on JUNO > - virtio on emulation > - optee on QEMU/optee using Linaro setup > > Exercised using the regular SCMI drivers stack and the SCMI ACS suite, > testing commands, replies, delayed responses and notification. > > Multiple virtual SCMI instances support has been tested too. > > SMC has NOT been tested/exercised at run-time, only compile-tested. > (due to lack of hardware) Hi Christian, I have validated this series on Qualcomm SA8255p(to be upstreamed) Ride platform that uses Qualcomm SMC transport for SCMI. Thanks, -Nikunj > Note that in this new setup, all the probe deferral and retries between the > SCMI core stack and the transports has been removed, since no more needed. > > Moreover the new drivers have been tested also with a fully modularized > SCMI stack, i.e.: > > scmi-core.ko + scmi-module.ko + scmi_transport_*.ko [ + vendor modules ] > > Based on v6.11-rc1 > > Any feedback, and especially testing (:D) is welcome. > > Thanks, > Cristian > > --- > v2 --> v3 > - rebased on v6.11-rc1 > - fixed spacing in Kconfig > - fixed Copyrights all over > - fixed platform_driver_register callsite in OPTEE transport > - refactored DEFINE_SCMI_TRANSPORT_DRIVER() to: > + use alloc + add_data + add platform drivers methods so as to implictly > use a standard default device_release method. > + drop .remove method in favour of devres_add_action_or_reset > + use explicit parameter passing (no more concatenation) > - renamed scmi_transport_lookup() to scmi_transport_setup() > - use IOMEM_ERR_PTR to avoid sparse issues > > v1 --> v2 > - fixed setup_shmem_iomap to address also SMC needs (QC/nikunj) > (silencing also warnings by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>) > - using __free OF cleanup.h magic in setup_shmme_iomap > - properly handle platform_driver_register() failures (Dan) > - fixed a few commit message style > - added a few missing static in scmi_desc > (addresses warnings by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>) > > > Cristian Marussi (8): > firmware: arm_scmi: Fix double free in OPTEE transport > firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce packet handling helpers > firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for standalone transport drivers > firmware: arm_scmi: Make MBOX transport a standalone driver > firmware: arm_scmi: Make SMC transport a standalone driver > firmware: arm_scmi: Make OPTEE transport a standalone driver > firmware: arm_scmi: Make VirtIO transport a standalone driver > firmware: arm_scmi: Remove legacy transport-layer code > > Peng Fan (1): > firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce setup_shmem_iomap > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig | 20 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 9 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 184 +++++++++++++----- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 142 +++++--------- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/msg.c | 32 ++- > .../{mailbox.c => scmi_transport_mailbox.c} | 72 +++---- > .../{optee.c => scmi_transport_optee.c} | 130 ++++++------- > .../arm_scmi/{smc.c => scmi_transport_smc.c} | 57 +++--- > .../{virtio.c => scmi_transport_virtio.c} | 102 +++++----- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c | 85 ++++++-- > 10 files changed, 477 insertions(+), 356 deletions(-) > rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{mailbox.c => scmi_transport_mailbox.c} (86%) > rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{optee.c => scmi_transport_optee.c} (89%) > rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{smc.c => scmi_transport_smc.c} (87%) > rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{virtio.c => scmi_transport_virtio.c} (94%) >
On 7/30/24 06:33, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Hi all, > > Till now the SCMI transport layer was being built embedded into in the core > SCMI stack. > > Some of these transports, despite being currently part of the main SCMI > module, are indeed also registered with different subsystems like optee or > virtio, and actively probed also by those: this led to a few awkward and > convoluted tricks to properly handle such interactions at boot time in the > SCMI stack. > > Moreover some partner expressed the desire to be able to fully modularize > the transports components. > > This series aim to make all such transports as standalone drivers that can > be optionally loaded as modules. > > In order to do this, at first some new mechanism is introduced to support > this new capability while maintaining, in parallel, the old legacy embedded > transports; then each transport, one by one, is transitioned to be a > standalone driver and finally the old legacy support for embedded transport > is removed. > > Patch [1/9] is a fix around the chan_free method for OPTEE transport; it is > really unrelated to this series, but included to avoid conflicts. > > Patch [2/9] is a mostly unrelated (but much needed) clean-up from Peng, > which I included in this series to avoid conflicts at merge. > > Patch [3/9] simply collects the existing datagram manipulation helpers in a > pair of function pointers structures, in preparation for later reworks. > > Patch [4/9] adds the bulk of the new logic to the core SCMI stack and then > each existing transport is transitioned to be a standalone driver in > patches 5,6,7,8 while shuffling around the compatibles. (no DT change is > needed of curse for backward compatibility) > While doing this I kept the module authorship in line with the main > author(S) as spitted out by git-blame. > > Finally patch [9/9] removes all the legacy dead code from the core SCMI > stack. > > No new symbol EXPORT has been added. > > The new transport drivers have been tested, as built-in and LKM, as > follows: > > - mailbox on JUNO > - virtio on emulation > - optee on QEMU/optee using Linaro setup > > Exercised using the regular SCMI drivers stack and the SCMI ACS suite, > testing commands, replies, delayed responses and notification. > > Multiple virtual SCMI instances support has been tested too. > > SMC has NOT been tested/exercised at run-time, only compile-tested. > (due to lack of hardware) > > Note that in this new setup, all the probe deferral and retries between the > SCMI core stack and the transports has been removed, since no more needed. > > Moreover the new drivers have been tested also with a fully modularized > SCMI stack, i.e.: > > scmi-core.ko + scmi-module.ko + scmi_transport_*.ko [ + vendor modules ] > > Based on v6.11-rc1 > > Any feedback, and especially testing (:D) is welcome. Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 09:47:17AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 7/30/24 06:33, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Till now the SCMI transport layer was being built embedded into in the core > > SCMI stack. > > > > Some of these transports, despite being currently part of the main SCMI > > module, are indeed also registered with different subsystems like optee or > > virtio, and actively probed also by those: this led to a few awkward and > > convoluted tricks to properly handle such interactions at boot time in the > > SCMI stack. > > > > Moreover some partner expressed the desire to be able to fully modularize > > the transports components. > > > > This series aim to make all such transports as standalone drivers that can > > be optionally loaded as modules. > > > > In order to do this, at first some new mechanism is introduced to support > > this new capability while maintaining, in parallel, the old legacy embedded > > transports; then each transport, one by one, is transitioned to be a > > standalone driver and finally the old legacy support for embedded transport > > is removed. > > > > Patch [1/9] is a fix around the chan_free method for OPTEE transport; it is > > really unrelated to this series, but included to avoid conflicts. > > > > Patch [2/9] is a mostly unrelated (but much needed) clean-up from Peng, > > which I included in this series to avoid conflicts at merge. > > > > Patch [3/9] simply collects the existing datagram manipulation helpers in a > > pair of function pointers structures, in preparation for later reworks. > > > > Patch [4/9] adds the bulk of the new logic to the core SCMI stack and then > > each existing transport is transitioned to be a standalone driver in > > patches 5,6,7,8 while shuffling around the compatibles. (no DT change is > > needed of curse for backward compatibility) > > While doing this I kept the module authorship in line with the main > > author(S) as spitted out by git-blame. > > > > Finally patch [9/9] removes all the legacy dead code from the core SCMI > > stack. > > > > No new symbol EXPORT has been added. > > > > The new transport drivers have been tested, as built-in and LKM, as > > follows: > > > > - mailbox on JUNO > > - virtio on emulation > > - optee on QEMU/optee using Linaro setup > > > > Exercised using the regular SCMI drivers stack and the SCMI ACS suite, > > testing commands, replies, delayed responses and notification. > > > > Multiple virtual SCMI instances support has been tested too. > > > > SMC has NOT been tested/exercised at run-time, only compile-tested. > > (due to lack of hardware) > > > > Note that in this new setup, all the probe deferral and retries between the > > SCMI core stack and the transports has been removed, since no more needed. > > > > Moreover the new drivers have been tested also with a fully modularized > > SCMI stack, i.e.: > > > > scmi-core.ko + scmi-module.ko + scmi_transport_*.ko [ + vendor modules ] > > > > Based on v6.11-rc1 > > > > Any feedback, and especially testing (:D) is welcome. > > Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Thanks ! Cristian