Message ID | 20241202030527.20586-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors in task work | expand |
在 2024/12/2 11:05, Shuai Xue 写道: > changes singce v16: > - add reviewed-by tag for patch 1 and patch 2 from Yazen > - rewrite warning message for force kill (per Yazen) > - warn with dev_err in ghes (per Jarkko) > - add return value -ENXIO in memory_failure comments (per Yazen) > - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241104015430.98599-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com/ > > changes singce v15: > - add HW_ERR and GHES_PFX prefix per Yazen > > changes since v14: > - add reviewed-by tags from Jarkko and Jonathan > - remove local variable and use twcb->pfn > > changes since v13: > - add reviewed-by tag from Jarkko > - rename task_work to ghes_task_work (per Jarkko) > > changes since v12: > - tweak error message for force kill (per Jarkko) > - fix comments style (per Jarkko) > - fix commit log typo (per Jarko) > > changes since v11: > - rebase to Linux 6.11-rc6 > - fix grammer and typo in commit log (per Borislav) > - remove `sync_` perfix of `sync_task_work` (per Borislav) > - comments flags and description of `task_work` (per Borislav) > > changes since v10: > - rebase to v6.8-rc2 > > changes since v9: > - split patch 2 to address exactly one issue in one patch (per Borislav) > - rewrite commit log according to template (per Borislav) > - pickup reviewed-by tag of patch 1 from James Morse > - alloc and free twcb through gen_pool_{alloc, free) (Per James) > - rewrite cover letter > > changes since v8: > - remove the bug fix tag of patch 2 (per Jarkko Sakkinen) > - remove the declaration of memory_failure_queue_kick (per Naoya Horiguchi) > - rewrite the return value comments of memory_failure (per Naoya Horiguchi) > > changes since v7: > - rebase to Linux v6.6-rc2 (no code changed) > - rewritten the cover letter to explain the motivation of this patchset > > changes since v6: > - add more explicty error message suggested by Xiaofei > - pick up reviewed-by tag from Xiaofei > - pick up internal reviewed-by tag from Baolin > > changes since v5 by addressing comments from Kefeng: > - document return value of memory_failure() > - drop redundant comments in call site of memory_failure() > - make ghes_do_proc void and handle abnormal case within it > - pick up reviewed-by tag from Kefeng Wang > > changes since v4 by addressing comments from Xiaofei: > - do a force kill only for abnormal sync errors > > changes since v3 by addressing comments from Xiaofei: > - do a force kill for abnormal memory failure error such as invalid PA, > unexpected severity, OOM, etc > - pcik up tested-by tag from Ma Wupeng > > changes since v2 by addressing comments from Naoya: > - rename mce_task_work to sync_task_work > - drop ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_MCE case in is_hest_sync_notify() > - add steps to reproduce this problem in cover letter > > changes since v1: > - synchronous events by notify type > - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221206153354.92394-3-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com/ > > ## Cover Letter > > There are two major types of uncorrected recoverable (UCR) errors : > > - Synchronous error: The error is detected and raised at the point of the > consumption in the execution flow, e.g. when a CPU tries to access > a poisoned cache line. The CPU will take a synchronous error exception > such as Synchronous External Abort (SEA) on Arm64 and Machine Check > Exception (MCE) on X86. OS requires to take action (for example, offline > failure page/kill failure thread) to recover this uncorrectable error. > > - Asynchronous error: The error is detected out of processor execution > context, e.g. when an error is detected by a background scrubber. Some data > in the memory are corrupted. But the data have not been consumed. OS is > optional to take action to recover this uncorrectable error. > > Currently, both synchronous and asynchronous error use > memory_failure_queue() to schedule memory_failure() exectute in kworker > context. As a result, when a user-space process is accessing a poisoned > data, a data abort is taken and the memory_failure() is executed in the > kworker context: > > - will send wrong si_code by SIGBUS signal in early_kill mode, and > - can not kill the user-space in some cases resulting a synchronous > error infinite loop > > Issue 1: send wrong si_code in early_kill mode > > Since commit a70297d22132 ("ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as > MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events")', the flag MF_ACTION_REQUIRED > could be used to determine whether a synchronous exception occurs on > ARM64 platform. When a synchronous exception is detected, the kernel is > expected to terminate the current process which has accessed poisoned > page. This is done by sending a SIGBUS signal with an error code > BUS_MCEERR_AR, indicating an action-required machine check error on > read. > > However, when kill_proc() is called to terminate the processes who have > the poisoned page mapped, it sends the incorrect SIGBUS error code > BUS_MCEERR_AO because the context in which it operates is not the one > where the error was triggered. > > To reproduce this problem: > > # STEP1: enable early kill mode > #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1 > vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1 > > # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error > #einj_mem_uc single > 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 > injecting ... > triggering ... > signal 7 code 5 addr 0xffffb0d75000 > page not present > Test passed > > The si_code (code 5) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AO > error and it is not fact. > > To fix it, queue memory_failure() as a task_work so that it runs in > the context of the process that is actually consuming the poisoned data. > > After this patch set: > > # STEP1: enable early kill mode > #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1 > vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1 > > # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error > #einj_mem_uc single > 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 > injecting ... > triggering ... > signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000 > page not present > Test passed > > The si_code (code 4) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AR > error as we expected. > > Issue 2: a synchronous error infinite loop due to memory_failure() failed > > If a user-space process, e.g. devmem, a poisoned page which has been set > HWPosion flag, kill_accessing_process() is called to send SIGBUS to the > current processs with error info. Because the memory_failure() is > executed in the kworker contex, it will just do nothing but return > EFAULT. So, devmem will access the posioned page and trigger an > excepction again, resulting in a synchronous error infinite loop. Such > loop may cause platform firmware to exceed some threshold and reboot > when Linux could have recovered from this error. > > To reproduce this problem: > > # STEP 1: inject an UCE error, and kernel will set HWPosion flag for related page > #einj_mem_uc single > 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400 > injecting ... > triggering ... > signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000 > page not present > Test passed > > # STEP 2: access the same page and it will trigger a synchronous error infinite loop > devmem 0x4092d55b400 > > To fix it, if memory_failure() failed, perform a force kill to current process. > > Issue 3: a synchronous error infinite loop due to no memory_failure() queued > > No memory_failure() work is queued unless all bellow preconditions check passed: > > - `if (!(mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PA))` in ghes_handle_memory_failure() > - `if (flags == -1)` in ghes_handle_memory_failure() > - `if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE))` in ghes_do_memory_failure() > - `if (!pfn_valid(pfn) && !arch_is_platform_page(physical_addr)) ` in ghes_do_memory_failure() > > If the preconditions are not passed, the user-space process will trigger SEA again. > This loop can potentially exceed the platform firmware threshold or even > trigger a kernel hard lockup, leading to a system reboot. > > To fix it, if no memory_failure() queued, perform a force kill to current process. > > And the the memory errors triggered in kernel-mode[5], also relies on this > patchset to kill the failure thread. > > Lv Ying and XiuQi from Huawei also proposed to address similar problem[2][4]. > Acknowledge to discussion with them. > > [1] Add ARMv8 RAS virtualization support in QEMU https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200512030609.19593-1-gengdongjiu@huawei.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221205115111.131568-3-lvying6@huawei.com/ > [3] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914064935.7851-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221209095407.383211-1-lvying6@huawei.com/ > [5] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/20240528085915.1955987-1-tongtiangen@huawei.com/ > > Shuai Xue (3): > ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error > not recovered > mm: memory-failure: move return value documentation to function > declaration > ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 7 --- > drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- > include/acpi/ghes.h | 3 -- > include/linux/mm.h | 1 - > mm/memory-failure.c | 23 +++------ > 5 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) > Hi, Rafael, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to provide an update on the current status of the patch set, now at *revision 17*. Each patch has been thoroughly reviewed by 3-5 reviewers, and their feedback has been incorporated to address any concerns. Given the extensive review and iterations the patch set has undergone, I would like to inquire that are you happy to queue this patch set? Best Regards, Shuai