Message ID | 20250207145438.1333475-1-qperret@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Fixes for pKVM NP-guest support | expand |
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote: > Hi all, > > Here are two patches to deal with a race between the handling of > permission faults and MMU notifiers with pKVM that I found by > inspection. Specifically, pKVM gets thoroughly confused when it doesn't > find a page mapped in its relax_perm path, while standard KVM deals > with that trivially thanks to the -EAGAIN special case in > user_mem_abort(). The second patch addresses the problem by simplifying > the implementation of multiple pKVM hypercalls, which also has the nice > side effect of improving locking by not taking the global host stage-2 > lock as much. > > Patches based on 6.14-rc1, tested in qemu on on Google Pixel 6. Looks reasonable to me, the locking improvements are certainly an added bonus. Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:54:36 +0000, Quentin Perret wrote: > Here are two patches to deal with a race between the handling of > permission faults and MMU notifiers with pKVM that I found by > inspection. Specifically, pKVM gets thoroughly confused when it doesn't > find a page mapped in its relax_perm path, while standard KVM deals > with that trivially thanks to the -EAGAIN special case in > user_mem_abort(). The second patch addresses the problem by simplifying > the implementation of multiple pKVM hypercalls, which also has the nice > side effect of improving locking by not taking the global host stage-2 > lock as much. > > [...] Applied to fixes, thanks! [1/2] KVM: arm64: Improve error handling from check_host_shared_guest() commit: c53fbdb60fb61fd6bda2bc0dc89837966625c5dc [2/2] KVM: arm64: Simplify np-guest hypercalls commit: eabc7aaef7a553b64bf6e631ce04526af6c8d104 Cheers, M.