mbox series

[0/3] gs101 max77759 enablement (DT)

Message ID 20250306-b4-max77759-mfd-dts-v1-0-9fe8b0eb8123@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series gs101 max77759 enablement (DT) | expand

Message

André Draszik March 6, 2025, 10:14 a.m. UTC
Hi,

This series enables the recently submitted Maxim max77759 driver and
updates the DT for the Google Pixel 6 / Pro (oriole / raven) boards
accordingly.

!!! Dependency note !!!

This series depends on the corresponding driver and DT bindings
proposed in
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250228-max77759-mfd-v3-0-0c3627d42526@linaro.org

Note that in that series bindings and gpio driver are accepted, but mfd
and nvmem drivers are still waiting for review comments.

!!! Dependency note end !!!

This gives us some extra GPIOs, and enables NVMEM which is used to
communicate the requested boot mode to the bootloader when doing a cold
reset.

Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
---
André Draszik (3):
      arm64: defconfig: enable Maxim max77759 driver
      arm64: dts: exynos: gs101-pixel-common: add the MAX77759 PMIC
      arm64: dts: exynos: gs101-pixel-common: add nvmem-reboot-mode

 .../boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101-pixel-common.dtsi | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig                       |  1 +
 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 0226d0ce98a477937ed295fb7df4cc30b46fc304
change-id: 20250306-b4-max77759-mfd-dts-fb88b6c6bd60

Best regards,

Comments

André Draszik March 6, 2025, 10:57 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 10:14 +0000, André Draszik wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This series enables the recently submitted Maxim max77759 driver and
> updates the DT for the Google Pixel 6 / Pro (oriole / raven) boards
> accordingly.
> 
> !!! Dependency note !!!
> 
> This series depends on the corresponding driver and DT bindings
> proposed in
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250228-max77759-mfd-v3-0-0c3627d42526@linaro.org
> 
> Note that in that series bindings and gpio driver are accepted, but mfd
> and nvmem drivers are still waiting for review comments.

To avoid ambiguity... with 'accepted' I meant reviewed, but not merged!

A.