diff mbox series

[RFC,v8,08/14] arm64/mm: disable section/contiguous mappings if XPFO is enabled

Message ID 0b9624b6c1fe5a31d73a6390e063d551bfebc321.1550088114.git.khalid.aziz@oracle.com (mailing list archive)
State RFC
Headers show
Series Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership | expand

Commit Message

Khalid Aziz Feb. 14, 2019, 12:01 a.m. UTC
From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>

XPFO doesn't support section/contiguous mappings yet, so let's disable it
if XPFO is turned on.

Thanks to Laura Abbot for the simplification from v5, and Mark Rutland for
pointing out we need NO_CONT_MAPPINGS too.

CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>
Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c  | 2 +-
 include/linux/xpfo.h | 4 ++++
 mm/xpfo.c            | 6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Mark Rutland Feb. 15, 2019, 1:09 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 05:01:31PM -0700, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>
> 
> XPFO doesn't support section/contiguous mappings yet, so let's disable it
> if XPFO is turned on.
> 
> Thanks to Laura Abbot for the simplification from v5, and Mark Rutland for
> pointing out we need NO_CONT_MAPPINGS too.
> 
> CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>
> Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>

There should be no point in this series where it's possible to enable a
broken XPFO. Either this patch should be merged into the rest of the
arm64 bits, or it should be placed before the rest of the arm64 bits.

That's a pre-requisite for merging, and it significantly reduces the
burden on reviewers.

In general, a patch series should bisect cleanly. Could you please
restructure the series to that effect?

Thanks,
Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c  | 2 +-
>  include/linux/xpfo.h | 4 ++++
>  mm/xpfo.c            | 6 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index d1d6601b385d..f4dd27073006 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp)
>  	struct memblock_region *reg;
>  	int flags = 0;
>  
> -	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled())
> +	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled() || xpfo_enabled())
>  		flags = NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/include/linux/xpfo.h b/include/linux/xpfo.h
> index 1ae05756344d..8b029918a958 100644
> --- a/include/linux/xpfo.h
> +++ b/include/linux/xpfo.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ void xpfo_temp_map(const void *addr, size_t size, void **mapping,
>  void xpfo_temp_unmap(const void *addr, size_t size, void **mapping,
>  		     size_t mapping_len);
>  
> +bool xpfo_enabled(void);
> +
>  #else /* !CONFIG_XPFO */
>  
>  static inline void xpfo_kmap(void *kaddr, struct page *page) { }
> @@ -69,6 +71,8 @@ static inline void xpfo_temp_unmap(const void *addr, size_t size,
>  }
>  
>  
> +static inline bool xpfo_enabled(void) { return false; }
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_XPFO */
>  
>  #endif /* _LINUX_XPFO_H */
> diff --git a/mm/xpfo.c b/mm/xpfo.c
> index 92ca6d1baf06..150784ae0f08 100644
> --- a/mm/xpfo.c
> +++ b/mm/xpfo.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,12 @@ struct page_ext_operations page_xpfo_ops = {
>  	.init = init_xpfo,
>  };
>  
> +bool __init xpfo_enabled(void)
> +{
> +	return !xpfo_disabled;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xpfo_enabled);
> +
>  static inline struct xpfo *lookup_xpfo(struct page *page)
>  {
>  	struct page_ext *page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>
Khalid Aziz Feb. 15, 2019, 2:47 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2/15/19 6:09 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 05:01:31PM -0700, Khalid Aziz wrote:
>> From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>
>>
>> XPFO doesn't support section/contiguous mappings yet, so let's disable it
>> if XPFO is turned on.
>>
>> Thanks to Laura Abbot for the simplification from v5, and Mark Rutland for
>> pointing out we need NO_CONT_MAPPINGS too.
>>
>> CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
> 
> There should be no point in this series where it's possible to enable a
> broken XPFO. Either this patch should be merged into the rest of the
> arm64 bits, or it should be placed before the rest of the arm64 bits.
> 
> That's a pre-requisite for merging, and it significantly reduces the
> burden on reviewers.
> 
> In general, a patch series should bisect cleanly. Could you please
> restructure the series to that effect?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.

That sounds reasonable to me. I will merge this with patch 5 ("arm64/mm:
Add support for XPFO") for the next version unless there are objections.

Thanks,
Khalid

> 
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c  | 2 +-
>>  include/linux/xpfo.h | 4 ++++
>>  mm/xpfo.c            | 6 ++++++
>>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> index d1d6601b385d..f4dd27073006 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp)
>>  	struct memblock_region *reg;
>>  	int flags = 0;
>>  
>> -	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled())
>> +	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled() || xpfo_enabled())
>>  		flags = NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
>>  
>>  	/*
>> diff --git a/include/linux/xpfo.h b/include/linux/xpfo.h
>> index 1ae05756344d..8b029918a958 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/xpfo.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/xpfo.h
>> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ void xpfo_temp_map(const void *addr, size_t size, void **mapping,
>>  void xpfo_temp_unmap(const void *addr, size_t size, void **mapping,
>>  		     size_t mapping_len);
>>  
>> +bool xpfo_enabled(void);
>> +
>>  #else /* !CONFIG_XPFO */
>>  
>>  static inline void xpfo_kmap(void *kaddr, struct page *page) { }
>> @@ -69,6 +71,8 @@ static inline void xpfo_temp_unmap(const void *addr, size_t size,
>>  }
>>  
>>  
>> +static inline bool xpfo_enabled(void) { return false; }
>> +
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_XPFO */
>>  
>>  #endif /* _LINUX_XPFO_H */
>> diff --git a/mm/xpfo.c b/mm/xpfo.c
>> index 92ca6d1baf06..150784ae0f08 100644
>> --- a/mm/xpfo.c
>> +++ b/mm/xpfo.c
>> @@ -71,6 +71,12 @@ struct page_ext_operations page_xpfo_ops = {
>>  	.init = init_xpfo,
>>  };
>>  
>> +bool __init xpfo_enabled(void)
>> +{
>> +	return !xpfo_disabled;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xpfo_enabled);
>> +
>>  static inline struct xpfo *lookup_xpfo(struct page *page)
>>  {
>>  	struct page_ext *page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index d1d6601b385d..f4dd27073006 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@  static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp)
 	struct memblock_region *reg;
 	int flags = 0;
 
-	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled())
+	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled() || xpfo_enabled())
 		flags = NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/include/linux/xpfo.h b/include/linux/xpfo.h
index 1ae05756344d..8b029918a958 100644
--- a/include/linux/xpfo.h
+++ b/include/linux/xpfo.h
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@  void xpfo_temp_map(const void *addr, size_t size, void **mapping,
 void xpfo_temp_unmap(const void *addr, size_t size, void **mapping,
 		     size_t mapping_len);
 
+bool xpfo_enabled(void);
+
 #else /* !CONFIG_XPFO */
 
 static inline void xpfo_kmap(void *kaddr, struct page *page) { }
@@ -69,6 +71,8 @@  static inline void xpfo_temp_unmap(const void *addr, size_t size,
 }
 
 
+static inline bool xpfo_enabled(void) { return false; }
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_XPFO */
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_XPFO_H */
diff --git a/mm/xpfo.c b/mm/xpfo.c
index 92ca6d1baf06..150784ae0f08 100644
--- a/mm/xpfo.c
+++ b/mm/xpfo.c
@@ -71,6 +71,12 @@  struct page_ext_operations page_xpfo_ops = {
 	.init = init_xpfo,
 };
 
+bool __init xpfo_enabled(void)
+{
+	return !xpfo_disabled;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xpfo_enabled);
+
 static inline struct xpfo *lookup_xpfo(struct page *page)
 {
 	struct page_ext *page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);