| Message ID | 1341303873-23040-2-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:24 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > The origin code misses to update the bitflip_threshold when > we have already get the right ecc_strength. > > The patch fixes it. > > Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com> Should we be pushing this for 3.5?
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:49 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:24 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: >> The origin code misses to update the bitflip_threshold when >> we have already get the right ecc_strength. >> >> The patch fixes it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com> > > Should we be pushing this for 3.5? > I think it's not needed to push this patch for 3.5. It's okay to merge it in 3.6. thanks Huang Shijie > -- > dwmw2 > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c index a1bf31f..ed9571b 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c @@ -1501,6 +1501,7 @@ static int gpmi_pre_bbt_scan(struct gpmi_nand_data *this) /* Adjust the ECC strength according to the chip. */ this->nand.ecc.strength = this->bch_geometry.ecc_strength; this->mtd.ecc_strength = this->bch_geometry.ecc_strength; + this->mtd.bitflip_threshold = this->bch_geometry.ecc_strength; /* NAND boot init, depends on the gpmi_set_geometry(). */ return nand_boot_init(this);
The origin code misses to update the bitflip_threshold when we have already get the right ecc_strength. The patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com> --- drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)