diff mbox

[12/24] xen/arm: Introduce xen_guest_init

Message ID 1343316846-25860-12-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Stefano Stabellini July 26, 2012, 3:33 p.m. UTC
We used to rely on a core_initcall to initialize Xen on ARM, however
core_initcalls are actually called after early consoles are initialized.
That means that hvc_xen.c is going to be initialized before Xen.

Given the lack of a better alternative, just call a new Xen
initialization function (xen_guest_init) from xen_cons_init.

xen_guest_init has to be arch independent, so write both an ARM and an
x86 implementation. The x86 implementation is currently empty because we
can be sure that xen_hvm_guest_init is called early enough.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
---
 arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c  |    7 ++++++-
 arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c  |    8 ++++++++
 drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c |    7 ++++++-
 include/xen/xen.h         |    2 ++
 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Ian Campbell July 27, 2012, 9:42 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 16:33 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> We used to rely on a core_initcall to initialize Xen on ARM, however
> core_initcalls are actually called after early consoles are initialized.
> That means that hvc_xen.c is going to be initialized before Xen.
> 
> Given the lack of a better alternative, just call a new Xen
> initialization function (xen_guest_init) from xen_cons_init.

Can't we just arrange for this to be called super early on from
setup_arch? That's got to be better than calling it from some random
function which happens to get called early enough.

I presume that KVM is going to want some similarly early init hooks etc
and therefore ARM could benefit from the same sort of infrastructure as
is in arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h?


> 
> xen_guest_init has to be arch independent, so write both an ARM and an
> x86 implementation. The x86 implementation is currently empty because we
> can be sure that xen_hvm_guest_init is called early enough.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c  |    7 ++++++-
>  arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c  |    8 ++++++++
>  drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c |    7 ++++++-
>  include/xen/xen.h         |    2 ++
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> index 8c923af..dc68074 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_remap_domain_mfn_range);
>   * - one interrupt for Xen event notifications;
>   * - one memory region to map the grant_table.
>   */
> -static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
> +int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>  {
>  	int cpu;
>  	struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp;
> @@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>  	}
>  	xen_domain_type = XEN_HVM_DOMAIN;
>  
> +	/* already setup */
> +	if (shared_info_page != 0 && HYPERVISOR_shared_info == shared_info_page)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (!shared_info_page)
>  		shared_info_page = (struct shared_info *)
>  			get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -88,4 +92,5 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_guest_init);
>  core_initcall(xen_guest_init);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index ff962d4..6131d43 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -1567,4 +1567,12 @@ const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_xen_hvm __refconst = {
>  	.init_platform		= xen_hvm_guest_init,
>  };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_hyper_xen_hvm);
> +
> +int __init xen_guest_init(void)
> +{
> +	/* do nothing: rely on x86_hyper_xen_hvm for the initialization */
> +	return 0;
> +	
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_guest_init);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> index dc07f56..3c04fb8 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> @@ -577,6 +577,12 @@ static void __exit xen_hvc_fini(void)
>  static int xen_cons_init(void)
>  {
>  	const struct hv_ops *ops;
> +	int r;
> +
> +	/* retrieve xen infos  */
> +	r = xen_guest_init();
> +	if (r < 0)
> +		return r;
>  
>  	if (!xen_domain())
>  		return 0;
> @@ -584,7 +590,6 @@ static int xen_cons_init(void)
>  	if (xen_initial_domain())
>  		ops = &dom0_hvc_ops;
>  	else {
> -		int r;
>  		ops = &domU_hvc_ops;
>  
>  		if (xen_hvm_domain())
> diff --git a/include/xen/xen.h b/include/xen/xen.h
> index 2c0d3a5..792a4d2 100644
> --- a/include/xen/xen.h
> +++ b/include/xen/xen.h
> @@ -9,8 +9,10 @@ enum xen_domain_type {
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_XEN
>  extern enum xen_domain_type xen_domain_type;
> +int xen_guest_init(void);
>  #else
>  #define xen_domain_type		XEN_NATIVE
> +static inline int xen_guest_init(void) { return 0; }
>  #endif
>  
>  #define xen_domain()		(xen_domain_type != XEN_NATIVE)
Stefano Stabellini July 27, 2012, 3:54 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 16:33 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > We used to rely on a core_initcall to initialize Xen on ARM, however
> > core_initcalls are actually called after early consoles are initialized.
> > That means that hvc_xen.c is going to be initialized before Xen.
> > 
> > Given the lack of a better alternative, just call a new Xen
> > initialization function (xen_guest_init) from xen_cons_init.
> 
> Can't we just arrange for this to be called super early on from
> setup_arch? That's got to be better than calling it from some random
> function which happens to get called early enough.

While I agree with you that an explicit call to xen_guest_init from
generic code might be better, xen_cons_init is not just a random
function: it is a console_initcall and therefore we know for sure that
it is going be the first one to be called.

In fact if we didn't want the PV console to work so early we could just
rely on a core_initcall to initialize everything and we wouldn't have
any issues.


In any case if the ARM maintainers agree I could add a generic
hypervisor initialization call the end of setup_arch.



> I presume that KVM is going to want some similarly early init hooks etc
> and therefore ARM could benefit from the same sort of infrastructure as
> is in arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h?
Ian Campbell July 27, 2012, 4:11 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 16:54 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 16:33 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > We used to rely on a core_initcall to initialize Xen on ARM, however
> > > core_initcalls are actually called after early consoles are initialized.
> > > That means that hvc_xen.c is going to be initialized before Xen.
> > > 
> > > Given the lack of a better alternative, just call a new Xen
> > > initialization function (xen_guest_init) from xen_cons_init.
> > 
> > Can't we just arrange for this to be called super early on from
> > setup_arch? That's got to be better than calling it from some random
> > function which happens to get called early enough.
> 
> While I agree with you that an explicit call to xen_guest_init from
> generic code might be better, xen_cons_init is not just a random
> function: it is a console_initcall and therefore we know for sure that
> it is going be the first one to be called.

Initialising something != console in a console_initcall just because it
happens to be called early enough meets my definition of calling it from
a random place.

> In fact if we didn't want the PV console to work so early we could just
> rely on a core_initcall to initialize everything and we wouldn't have
> any issues.
> 
> 
> In any case if the ARM maintainers agree I could add a generic
> hypervisor initialization call the end of setup_arch.
> 
> 
> 
> > I presume that KVM is going to want some similarly early init hooks etc
> > and therefore ARM could benefit from the same sort of infrastructure as
> > is in arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h?
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Aug. 1, 2012, 2:38 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:54PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> We used to rely on a core_initcall to initialize Xen on ARM, however
> core_initcalls are actually called after early consoles are initialized.
> That means that hvc_xen.c is going to be initialized before Xen.
> 
> Given the lack of a better alternative, just call a new Xen
> initialization function (xen_guest_init) from xen_cons_init.
> 
> xen_guest_init has to be arch independent, so write both an ARM and an
> x86 implementation. The x86 implementation is currently empty because we
> can be sure that xen_hvm_guest_init is called early enough.

Should the arm version then not be anymore on the core_initcall then?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c  |    7 ++++++-
>  arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c  |    8 ++++++++
>  drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c |    7 ++++++-
>  include/xen/xen.h         |    2 ++
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> index 8c923af..dc68074 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_remap_domain_mfn_range);
>   * - one interrupt for Xen event notifications;
>   * - one memory region to map the grant_table.
>   */
> -static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
> +int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>  {
>  	int cpu;
>  	struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp;
> @@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>  	}
>  	xen_domain_type = XEN_HVM_DOMAIN;
>  
> +	/* already setup */
> +	if (shared_info_page != 0 && HYPERVISOR_shared_info == shared_info_page)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (!shared_info_page)
>  		shared_info_page = (struct shared_info *)
>  			get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -88,4 +92,5 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_guest_init);

Why the export symbols?

>  core_initcall(xen_guest_init);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index ff962d4..6131d43 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -1567,4 +1567,12 @@ const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_xen_hvm __refconst = {
>  	.init_platform		= xen_hvm_guest_init,
>  };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_hyper_xen_hvm);
> +
> +int __init xen_guest_init(void)
> +{
> +	/* do nothing: rely on x86_hyper_xen_hvm for the initialization */
> +	return 0;
> +	
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_guest_init);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> index dc07f56..3c04fb8 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> @@ -577,6 +577,12 @@ static void __exit xen_hvc_fini(void)
>  static int xen_cons_init(void)
>  {
>  	const struct hv_ops *ops;
> +	int r;
> +
> +	/* retrieve xen infos  */
> +	r = xen_guest_init();
> +	if (r < 0)
> +		return r;
>  
>  	if (!xen_domain())
>  		return 0;
> @@ -584,7 +590,6 @@ static int xen_cons_init(void)
>  	if (xen_initial_domain())
>  		ops = &dom0_hvc_ops;
>  	else {
> -		int r;
>  		ops = &domU_hvc_ops;
>  
>  		if (xen_hvm_domain())
> diff --git a/include/xen/xen.h b/include/xen/xen.h
> index 2c0d3a5..792a4d2 100644
> --- a/include/xen/xen.h
> +++ b/include/xen/xen.h
> @@ -9,8 +9,10 @@ enum xen_domain_type {
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_XEN
>  extern enum xen_domain_type xen_domain_type;
> +int xen_guest_init(void);
>  #else
>  #define xen_domain_type		XEN_NATIVE
> +static inline int xen_guest_init(void) { return 0; }
>  #endif
>  
>  #define xen_domain()		(xen_domain_type != XEN_NATIVE)
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
index 8c923af..dc68074 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_remap_domain_mfn_range);
  * - one interrupt for Xen event notifications;
  * - one memory region to map the grant_table.
  */
-static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
+int __init xen_guest_init(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp;
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@  static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
 	}
 	xen_domain_type = XEN_HVM_DOMAIN;
 
+	/* already setup */
+	if (shared_info_page != 0 && HYPERVISOR_shared_info == shared_info_page)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (!shared_info_page)
 		shared_info_page = (struct shared_info *)
 			get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -88,4 +92,5 @@  static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_guest_init);
 core_initcall(xen_guest_init);
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index ff962d4..6131d43 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -1567,4 +1567,12 @@  const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_xen_hvm __refconst = {
 	.init_platform		= xen_hvm_guest_init,
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_hyper_xen_hvm);
+
+int __init xen_guest_init(void)
+{
+	/* do nothing: rely on x86_hyper_xen_hvm for the initialization */
+	return 0;
+	
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_guest_init);
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
index dc07f56..3c04fb8 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
@@ -577,6 +577,12 @@  static void __exit xen_hvc_fini(void)
 static int xen_cons_init(void)
 {
 	const struct hv_ops *ops;
+	int r;
+
+	/* retrieve xen infos  */
+	r = xen_guest_init();
+	if (r < 0)
+		return r;
 
 	if (!xen_domain())
 		return 0;
@@ -584,7 +590,6 @@  static int xen_cons_init(void)
 	if (xen_initial_domain())
 		ops = &dom0_hvc_ops;
 	else {
-		int r;
 		ops = &domU_hvc_ops;
 
 		if (xen_hvm_domain())
diff --git a/include/xen/xen.h b/include/xen/xen.h
index 2c0d3a5..792a4d2 100644
--- a/include/xen/xen.h
+++ b/include/xen/xen.h
@@ -9,8 +9,10 @@  enum xen_domain_type {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_XEN
 extern enum xen_domain_type xen_domain_type;
+int xen_guest_init(void);
 #else
 #define xen_domain_type		XEN_NATIVE
+static inline int xen_guest_init(void) { return 0; }
 #endif
 
 #define xen_domain()		(xen_domain_type != XEN_NATIVE)