Message ID | 1344033762-3296-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:42:42PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that ARM has implemented its spinlocks with tickets we don't > need to use the generic lockbreak algorithm. Remove the Kconfig > from ARM so that we use the arch_spin_is_contended() definition > from the asm header. This also saves a word in each lock because > we don't need the break_lock member anymore. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> > --- > > It seems we define the arch_spin_is_contended() macro but we don't > use it on SMP && PREEMPT kernels? Thanks, I missed that. Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Will
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig index e91c7cd..e4191cc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig @@ -126,11 +126,6 @@ config TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT bool default y -config GENERIC_LOCKBREAK - bool - default y - depends on SMP && PREEMPT - config RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK bool default y
Now that ARM has implemented its spinlocks with tickets we don't need to use the generic lockbreak algorithm. Remove the Kconfig from ARM so that we use the arch_spin_is_contended() definition from the asm header. This also saves a word in each lock because we don't need the break_lock member anymore. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> --- It seems we define the arch_spin_is_contended() macro but we don't use it on SMP && PREEMPT kernels? arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)