Message ID | 1347356538-23835-20-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:12:14PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote: > From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> > > even if our clocks are disabled, we still > handled the IRQ, so we should return IRQ_HANDLED. > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com> Can't we just drop this patch since the code gets removed soon anyhow? Or is patch 20/23 changing something I don't see yet?
On Wednesday 12 September 2012 03:23 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com> > Can't we just drop this patch since the code gets removed soon anyhow? > Or is patch 20/23 changing something I don't see yet? yes it is dropped will update.
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c index 498a462..4a696bd 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c @@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ omap_i2c_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id) int err = 0, count = 0; if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev->dev)) - return IRQ_NONE; + return IRQ_HANDLED; do { bits = omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_IE_REG);