From patchwork Fri Sep 21 15:56:13 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Cyril Chemparathy X-Patchwork-Id: 1492381 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882CF3FE65 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TF5dX-0006XL-2P; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:59:27 +0000 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TF5bL-0005fc-Mp for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:57:18 +0000 Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q8LFuc5M029298; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:56:38 -0500 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8LFucUs001267; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:56:38 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:56:38 -0500 Received: from ares-ubuntu.am.dhcp.ti.com (ares-ubuntu.am.dhcp.ti.com [158.218.103.17]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8LFucSH006526; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:56:38 -0500 Received: from a0875269 by ares-ubuntu.am.dhcp.ti.com with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TF5ao-00050z-0a; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:56:38 -0400 From: Cyril Chemparathy To: Subject: [PATCH v3 RESEND 15/17] ARM: mm: use physical addresses in highmem sanity checks Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:56:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1348242975-19184-16-git-send-email-cyril@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1348242975-19184-1-git-send-email-cyril@ti.com> References: <1348242975-19184-1-git-send-email-cyril@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Note: CRM114 invocation failed X-Spam-Score: -7.4 (-------) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-7.4 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [198.47.26.153 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, nico@linaro.org, Cyril Chemparathy , davidb@codeaurora.org, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, arnd@arndb.de, marc.zyngier@arm.com, rob.herring@calxeda.com, vitalya@ti.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rmallon@gmail.com, frank.rowand@am.sony.com, sjg@chromium.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rabin@rab.in, hsweeten@visionengravers.com, tj@kernel.org X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This patch modifies the highmem sanity checking code to use physical addresses instead. This change eliminates the wrap-around problems associated with the original virtual address based checks, and this simplifies the code a bit. The one constraint imposed here is that low physical memory must be mapped in a monotonically increasing fashion if there are multiple banks of memory, i.e., x < y must => pa(x) < pa(y). Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre --- arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 22 ++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c index 8db7c74..fcdc185 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c @@ -895,6 +895,7 @@ phys_addr_t arm_lowmem_limit __initdata = 0; void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) { int i, j, highmem = 0; + phys_addr_t vmalloc_limit = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1; for (i = 0, j = 0; i < meminfo.nr_banks; i++) { struct membank *bank = &meminfo.bank[j]; @@ -904,8 +905,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) highmem = 1; #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM - if (__va(bank->start) >= vmalloc_min || - __va(bank->start) < (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) + if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit) highmem = 1; bank->highmem = highmem; @@ -914,8 +914,8 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Split those memory banks which are partially overlapping * the vmalloc area greatly simplifying things later. */ - if (!highmem && __va(bank->start) < vmalloc_min && - bank->size > vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start)) { + if (!highmem && bank->start < vmalloc_limit && + bank->size > vmalloc_limit - bank->start) { if (meminfo.nr_banks >= NR_BANKS) { printk(KERN_CRIT "NR_BANKS too low, " "ignoring high memory\n"); @@ -924,12 +924,12 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) (meminfo.nr_banks - i) * sizeof(*bank)); meminfo.nr_banks++; i++; - bank[1].size -= vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start); - bank[1].start = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1; + bank[1].size -= vmalloc_limit - bank->start; + bank[1].start = vmalloc_limit; bank[1].highmem = highmem = 1; j++; } - bank->size = vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start); + bank->size = vmalloc_limit - bank->start; } #else bank->highmem = highmem; @@ -949,8 +949,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Check whether this memory bank would entirely overlap * the vmalloc area. */ - if (__va(bank->start) >= vmalloc_min || - __va(bank->start) < (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) { + if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit) { printk(KERN_NOTICE "Ignoring RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx " "(vmalloc region overlap).\n", (unsigned long long)bank->start, @@ -962,9 +961,8 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Check whether this memory bank would partially overlap * the vmalloc area. */ - if (__va(bank->start + bank->size - 1) >= vmalloc_min || - __va(bank->start + bank->size - 1) <= __va(bank->start)) { - unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start); + if (bank->start + bank->size > vmalloc_limit) + unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_limit - bank->start; printk(KERN_NOTICE "Truncating RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx " "to -%.8llx (vmalloc region overlap).\n", (unsigned long long)bank->start,