| Message ID | 1349882335-6786-5-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 16:18 Wed 10 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > Add the 3 UART nodes required to enable serial ports on the u9540. > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts | 13 ++++++++++++- dts? it's dtsi it's the soc not the board > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts > index 0a66f34..28efe20 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts > @@ -21,6 +21,17 @@ > }; > > soc-u9500 { > - }; > > + uart@80120000 { > + status = "okay"; > + }; > + > + uart@80121000 { > + status = "okay"; > + }; > + > + uart@80007000 { > + status = "okay"; > + }; do not enable device by default in the soc Best Regards, J. > + }; > }; > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 16:18 Wed 10 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > > Add the 3 UART nodes required to enable serial ports on the u9540. > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts | 13 ++++++++++++- > dts? it's dtsi No it's not. > it's the soc not the board This is the board file, not the SoC. > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts > > index 0a66f34..28efe20 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts > > @@ -21,6 +21,17 @@ > > }; > > > > soc-u9500 { > > - }; > > > > + uart@80120000 { > > + status = "okay"; > > + }; > > + > > + uart@80121000 { > > + status = "okay"; > > + }; > > + > > + uart@80007000 { > > + status = "okay"; > > + }; > do not enable device by default in the soc See above.
On 08:29 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > On 16:18 Wed 10 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > > > Add the 3 UART nodes required to enable serial ports on the u9540. > > > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts | 13 ++++++++++++- > > dts? it's dtsi > > No it's not. so the name of the file is wrong s u9540 is a SoC name Best Regards, J.
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 08:29 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > On 16:18 Wed 10 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > > > > Add the 3 UART nodes required to enable serial ports on the u9540. > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > > > --- > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts | 13 ++++++++++++- > > > dts? it's dtsi > > > > No it's not. > so the name of the file is wrong s u9540 is a SoC name The board could actually be called either ccu9540, or just u9540. I picked one and went with it. The full name is the u9540 development board.
On 10:22 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > On 08:29 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > > > On 16:18 Wed 10 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > Add the 3 UART nodes required to enable serial ports on the u9540. > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > > > > --- > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts | 13 ++++++++++++- > > > > dts? it's dtsi > > > > > > No it's not. > > so the name of the file is wrong s u9540 is a SoC name > > The board could actually be called either ccu9540, or just > u9540. I picked one and went with it. The full name is the > u9540 development board. so use ccu9540 as u9540 is the soc name so if we use u9540 as compatible we expect to mach the soc and not a board Best Regards, J.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> wrote: > On 10:22 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote: >> The board could actually be called either ccu9540, or just >> u9540. I picked one and went with it. The full name is the >> u9540 development board. > > so use ccu9540 as u9540 is the soc name so if we use u9540 as compatible we > expect to mach the soc and not a board I basically agree. However the SoC (digital ASIC) is named DB9540. U9540 is the entire chipset (DB9540, AB9540 etc) a variant of the NovaThor series. Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts index 0a66f34..28efe20 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/u9540.dts @@ -21,6 +21,17 @@ }; soc-u9500 { - }; + uart@80120000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + uart@80121000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + uart@80007000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + }; };