diff mbox

[1/1] usb: at91_udc: fix typo on vubs pullup valid check

Message ID 1352101183-20606-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Nov. 5, 2012, 7:39 a.m. UTC
if the gpio is not valid complain

since 3285e0ec088febc5a88f57ddd78385a7da71476c
ARM: at91/udc: use gpio_is_valid to check the gpio

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
---
Hi Greg,

	this is broken since 3.2 can we have on the stable too

Best Regards,
J.
 drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Greg KH Nov. 5, 2012, 7:49 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:39:43AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> if the gpio is not valid complain
> 
> since 3285e0ec088febc5a88f57ddd78385a7da71476c
> ARM: at91/udc: use gpio_is_valid to check the gpio
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> ---
> Hi Greg,
> 
> 	this is broken since 3.2 can we have on the stable too

Sure, but you should be sending gadget patches to Felipe, not me, as
he's in charge of that tree.  So I suggest you resend this, cc: Felipe
and add the proper stable tree marking to the Cc: area of the
signed-off-by: part of the patch, like the file
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt describes to do.  That way it will
be picked up automatically for the stable releases when it gets in to
Linus's tree.

thanks,

greg k-h
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
index 89d90b5..888cb2a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
@@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@  static int __devinit at91udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	/* rm9200 needs manual D+ pullup; off by default */
 	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200()) {
-		if (gpio_is_valid(udc->board.pullup_pin)) {
+		if (!gpio_is_valid(udc->board.pullup_pin)) {
 			DBG("no D+ pullup?\n");
 			retval = -ENODEV;
 			goto fail0;