diff mbox

[1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: fix the hotplug for Cortex-A15

Message ID 1352182356-28989-2-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Abhilash Kesavan Nov. 6, 2012, 6:12 a.m. UTC
The sequence of cpu_enter_lowpower() for Cortex-A15
is different from the sequence for Cortex-A9.
This patch implements cpu_enter_lowpower() for EXYNOS5
SoC which has Cortex-A15 cores.

Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn@samsung.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Kyungmin Park Nov. 6, 2012, 6:21 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 11/6/12, Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com> wrote:
> The sequence of cpu_enter_lowpower() for Cortex-A15
> is different from the sequence for Cortex-A9.
> This patch implements cpu_enter_lowpower() for EXYNOS5
> SoC which has Cortex-A15 cores.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn@samsung.com>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Tested-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c |   45
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> index f4d7dd2..8c06c4f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> @@ -20,10 +20,11 @@
>  #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>
>  #include <mach/regs-pmu.h>
> +#include <plat/cpu.h>
>
>  #include "common.h"
>
> -static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
> +static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a9(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int v;
>
> @@ -45,6 +46,35 @@ static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
>  	  : "cc");
>  }
>
> +static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a15(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int v;
> +
> +	asm volatile(
> +	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
> +	"	bic	%0, %0, %1\n"
> +	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
> +	  : "=&r" (v)
> +	  : "Ir" (CR_C)
> +	  : "cc");
> +
> +	flush_cache_all();
> +
> +	asm volatile(
> +	/*
> +	* Turn off coherency
> +	*/
> +	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
> +	"	bic	%0, %0, %1\n"
> +	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
> +	: "=&r" (v)
> +	: "Ir" (0x40)
> +	: "cc");
> +
> +	isb();
> +	dsb();
> +}
> +
>  static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int v;
> @@ -103,11 +133,20 @@ static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int
> cpu, int *spurious)
>  void __ref exynos_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	int spurious = 0;
> +	int primary_part = 0;
>
>  	/*
> -	 * we're ready for shutdown now, so do it
> +	 * we're ready for shutdown now, so do it.
> +	 * Exynos4 is A9 based while Exynos5 is A15; check the CPU part
> +	 * number by reading the Main ID register and then perform the
> +	 * appropriate sequence for entering low power.
>  	 */
> -	cpu_enter_lowpower();
> +	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c0, 0" : "=r"(primary_part) : : "cc");
> +	if ((primary_part & 0xfff0) == 0xc0f0)
Doesn't better to use soc_is_exynos5250? Actullay, it's better to use
soc_is_exynos5 for all exynos5 series. but not it doesn't have these
macro.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
> +		cpu_enter_lowpower_a15();
> +	else
> +		cpu_enter_lowpower_a9();
> +
>  	platform_do_lowpower(cpu, &spurious);
>
>  	/*
> --
> 1.6.6.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
Santosh Shilimkar Nov. 6, 2012, 12:17 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tuesday 06 November 2012 12:12 AM, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
> The sequence of cpu_enter_lowpower() for Cortex-A15
> is different from the sequence for Cortex-A9.
Are you sure ? Apart from integrated cache vs external, there
should be no change. And L2 doesn't need to come into picture
while powering down just a CPU.

> This patch implements cpu_enter_lowpower() for EXYNOS5
> SoC which has Cortex-A15 cores.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn@samsung.com>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Tested-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> index f4d7dd2..8c06c4f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> @@ -20,10 +20,11 @@
>   #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>
>   #include <mach/regs-pmu.h>
> +#include <plat/cpu.h>
>
>   #include "common.h"
>
> -static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
> +static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a9(void)
>   {
>   	unsigned int v;
>
> @@ -45,6 +46,35 @@ static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
>   	  : "cc");
>   }
>
> +static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a15(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int v;
> +
> +	asm volatile(
> +	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
> +	"	bic	%0, %0, %1\n"
> +	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
> +	  : "=&r" (v)
> +	  : "Ir" (CR_C)
> +	  : "cc");
> +
> +	flush_cache_all();
> +
Why are flushing all the cache levels ?
flush_kern_louis() should be enough for CPU power
down.

> +	asm volatile(
> +	/*
> +	* Turn off coherency
> +	*/
> +	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
> +	"	bic	%0, %0, %1\n"
> +	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
> +	: "=&r" (v)
> +	: "Ir" (0x40)
> +	: "cc");
> +
> +	isb();
> +	dsb();
> +}
> +
The above sequence should work on A9 as well. In general you should have
CPU power down code under one code block and avoid making use of stack 
in between. Otherwise you will end up with stack corruption because of
the memory view change after C bit is disabled.

Regards
Santosh
Lorenzo Pieralisi Nov. 6, 2012, 1:55 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:17:02PM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 November 2012 12:12 AM, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
> > The sequence of cpu_enter_lowpower() for Cortex-A15
> > is different from the sequence for Cortex-A9.
> Are you sure ? Apart from integrated cache vs external, there
> should be no change. And L2 doesn't need to come into picture
> while powering down just a CPU.

Reiterating Santosh point in here. v7 shutdown procedure is and has to
be identical across all v7 cores. There is not such a thing as "A15
specific" shutdown procedure.

Embedded L2 will come into the picture on multi-cluster systems, for the
time being L2 must not be flushed when hotplugging a CPU in a single cluster
so the LoUIS API is to be used here.

> > This patch implements cpu_enter_lowpower() for EXYNOS5
> > SoC which has Cortex-A15 cores.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> > Tested-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >   1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> > index f4d7dd2..8c06c4f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> > @@ -20,10 +20,11 @@
> >   #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
> >
> >   #include <mach/regs-pmu.h>
> > +#include <plat/cpu.h>
> >
> >   #include "common.h"
> >
> > -static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
> > +static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a9(void)
> >   {
> >   	unsigned int v;
> >
> > @@ -45,6 +46,35 @@ static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
> >   	  : "cc");
> >   }
> >
> > +static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a15(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int v;
> > +
> > +	asm volatile(
> > +	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
> > +	"	bic	%0, %0, %1\n"
> > +	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
> > +	  : "=&r" (v)
> > +	  : "Ir" (CR_C)
> > +	  : "cc");
> > +
> > +	flush_cache_all();
> > +
> Why are flushing all the cache levels ?
> flush_kern_louis() should be enough for CPU power
> down.

Agree with Santosh again.

> 
> > +	asm volatile(
> > +	/*
> > +	* Turn off coherency
> > +	*/
> > +	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
> > +	"	bic	%0, %0, %1\n"
> > +	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
> > +	: "=&r" (v)
> > +	: "Ir" (0x40)
> > +	: "cc");
> > +
> > +	isb();
> > +	dsb();
> > +}
> > +
> The above sequence should work on A9 as well. In general you should have
> CPU power down code under one code block and avoid making use of stack 
> in between. Otherwise you will end up with stack corruption because of
> the memory view change after C bit is disabled.
> 
> Regards
> Santosh

The above sequence does not work on A9 since A9 does not look-up the
caches when the C bit is cleared. It is an accident waiting to happen,
as Santosh explained.

The sequence:

- clear C bit
- clean L1
- exit SMP

must be written in assembly with no access to any data whatsoever, no stack,
_nothing_.

There is some code in the works to consolidate this procedure once for all but
all bits and pieces are already in the kernel.

Lorenzo
kgene@kernel.org Nov. 20, 2012, 9:41 a.m. UTC | #4
Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:17:02PM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 November 2012 12:12 AM, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
> > > The sequence of cpu_enter_lowpower() for Cortex-A15
> > > is different from the sequence for Cortex-A9.
> > Are you sure ? Apart from integrated cache vs external, there
> > should be no change. And L2 doesn't need to come into picture
> > while powering down just a CPU.
> 
> Reiterating Santosh point in here. v7 shutdown procedure is and has to
> be identical across all v7 cores. There is not such a thing as "A15
> specific" shutdown procedure.
> 
BTW, it's true that current codes cannot support A15. So we need a separate
A15 func. And a A9 func. Now, cpu_enter_lowpower_a9() on A15 does NOT
work...also cpu_enter_lowpower_a15() on A9 does NOT work as well...

> Embedded L2 will come into the picture on multi-cluster systems, for the
> time being L2 must not be flushed when hotplugging a CPU in a single
> cluster
> so the LoUIS API is to be used here.
> 
OK.

> > > This patch implements cpu_enter_lowpower() for EXYNOS5
> > > SoC which has Cortex-A15 cores.

[...]

> > >
> > > +static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a15(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	unsigned int v;
> > > +
> > > +	asm volatile(
> > > +	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
> > > +	"	bic	%0, %0, %1\n"
> > > +	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
> > > +	  : "=&r" (v)
> > > +	  : "Ir" (CR_C)
> > > +	  : "cc");
> > > +
> > > +	flush_cache_all();
> > > +
> > Why are flushing all the cache levels ?
> > flush_kern_louis() should be enough for CPU power
> > down.
> 
> Agree with Santosh again.
> 
Yes, agree. I will replace as per your suggestion when I apply this. And as
I know, Abhilash already tested it on the boards and it works fine.

> >
> > > +	asm volatile(
> > > +	/*
> > > +	* Turn off coherency
> > > +	*/
> > > +	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
> > > +	"	bic	%0, %0, %1\n"
> > > +	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
> > > +	: "=&r" (v)
> > > +	: "Ir" (0x40)
> > > +	: "cc");
> > > +
> > > +	isb();
> > > +	dsb();
> > > +}
> > > +
> > The above sequence should work on A9 as well. In general you should have
> > CPU power down code under one code block and avoid making use of stack
> > in between. Otherwise you will end up with stack corruption because of
> > the memory view change after C bit is disabled.
> >
> > Regards
> > Santosh
> 
> The above sequence does not work on A9 since A9 does not look-up the
> caches when the C bit is cleared. It is an accident waiting to happen,
> as Santosh explained.
> 
> The sequence:
> 
> - clear C bit
> - clean L1
> - exit SMP
> 
> must be written in assembly with no access to any data whatsoever, no
> stack,
> _nothing_.
> 
> There is some code in the works to consolidate this procedure once for all
> but
> all bits and pieces are already in the kernel.
> 
I see, so it means, at this moment, exynos stuff needs this patch until
finishing common implementation you said. Then, I think, if any common codes
are available, we can use new codes instead.

K-Gene <kgene@kernel.org>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
index f4d7dd2..8c06c4f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
@@ -20,10 +20,11 @@ 
 #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
 
 #include <mach/regs-pmu.h>
+#include <plat/cpu.h>
 
 #include "common.h"
 
-static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
+static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a9(void)
 {
 	unsigned int v;
 
@@ -45,6 +46,35 @@  static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
 	  : "cc");
 }
 
+static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a15(void)
+{
+	unsigned int v;
+
+	asm volatile(
+	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
+	"	bic	%0, %0, %1\n"
+	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
+	  : "=&r" (v)
+	  : "Ir" (CR_C)
+	  : "cc");
+
+	flush_cache_all();
+
+	asm volatile(
+	/*
+	* Turn off coherency
+	*/
+	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
+	"	bic	%0, %0, %1\n"
+	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
+	: "=&r" (v)
+	: "Ir" (0x40)
+	: "cc");
+
+	isb();
+	dsb();
+}
+
 static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
 {
 	unsigned int v;
@@ -103,11 +133,20 @@  static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
 void __ref exynos_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	int spurious = 0;
+	int primary_part = 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * we're ready for shutdown now, so do it
+	 * we're ready for shutdown now, so do it.
+	 * Exynos4 is A9 based while Exynos5 is A15; check the CPU part
+	 * number by reading the Main ID register and then perform the
+	 * appropriate sequence for entering low power.
 	 */
-	cpu_enter_lowpower();
+	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c0, 0" : "=r"(primary_part) : : "cc");
+	if ((primary_part & 0xfff0) == 0xc0f0)
+		cpu_enter_lowpower_a15();
+	else
+		cpu_enter_lowpower_a9();
+
 	platform_do_lowpower(cpu, &spurious);
 
 	/*