Message ID | 1352968401-6092-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset > call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010. > The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for 3.8. Arnd
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > > UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset > > call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010. > > The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge > it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for > 3.8. It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks. Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :)
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset > call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010. > The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Yours, Linus Walleij
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > > > UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset > > > call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010. > > > The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > > > What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge > > it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for > > 3.8. > > It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks. > > Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :) > Vinod, is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time? I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based on that work, so we are running out of time now. Arnd
On 11/16/2012 03:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >>> On Thursday 15 November 2012, Lee Jones wrote: >>>> UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset >>>> call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010. >>>> The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> >>> >>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>> >>> What is the state of the DMA binding now? We originally wanted to merge >>> it for 3.7, but that didn't work out, so I hope we can get it done for >>> 3.8. >> >> It's dead. The conversation has been stale for weeks. >> >> Perhaps you'd like to go and poke it? :) >> > > Vinod, > > is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend > his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time? > > I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based > on that work, so we are running out of time now. Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1]. Jon [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/89502
On Friday 16 November 2012, Jon Hunter wrote: > > is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend > > his latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time? > > > > I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based > > on that work, so we are running out of time now. > > Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1]. > Ok, very good. Thanks everyone! Arnd
> > > is there anything you are waiting for still? Should Jon resend his > > > latest patches to make sure we get them merged this time? > > > > > > I have multiple people that want to send me patches for 3.8 based on > > > that work, so we are running out of time now. > > > > Vinod responded today saying it will be in for v3.8 [1]. > > > > Ok, very good. Thanks everyone! If you have any patches for this, please send me. Your work should not stall, that is why I had the topic branch. I plan to merge this to my next mid next week,.... ....based on how early my travel permits :) -- ~Vinod
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c index 4a0c40a..d2076ce 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c @@ -262,11 +262,10 @@ static struct device * __init u8500_of_init_devices(void) static struct of_dev_auxdata u8500_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = { /* Requires call-back bindings. */ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,cortex-a9-pmu", 0, "arm-pmu", &db8500_pmu_platdata), - /* Requires DMA and call-back bindings. */ + /* Requires DMA bindings. */ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl011", 0x80120000, "uart0", &uart0_plat), OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl011", 0x80121000, "uart1", &uart1_plat), OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl011", 0x80007000, "uart2", &uart2_plat), - /* Requires DMA bindings. */ OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl022", 0x80002000, "ssp0", &ssp0_plat), OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl18x", 0x80126000, "sdi0", &mop500_sdi0_data), OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl18x", 0x80118000, "sdi1", &mop500_sdi1_data),
UARTs no longer require call-back information, since the reset call-back was removed in 43b5f0d69291374f602ad8e1817f329573a59010. The only AUXDATA dependencies remaining for UARTs are DMA settings. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)