Message ID | 1356005639-23466-4-git-send-email-Barry.Song@csr.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:13:53PM +0000, Barry Song wrote: > From: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com> > > prima2 and marco have diffetent l2 cache configuration, so > we initialize l2x0 cache based on dtb given to kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c > index c998377..909cc6f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c > @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ static struct of_device_id prima2_l2x0_ids[] = { > {}, > }; > > +static struct of_device_id marco_l2x0_ids[] = { > + { .compatible = "sirf,marco-pl310-cache" }, > + {}, > +}; > + > static int __init sirfsoc_l2x0_init(void) > { > struct device_node *np; > @@ -26,6 +31,15 @@ static int __init sirfsoc_l2x0_init(void) > return l2x0_of_init(0x40000, 0); > } > > + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, marco_l2x0_ids); > + if (np) { > + pr_info("Initializing marco L2 cache\n"); > + /* Way size: 32KB Associativity: 16-way */ > + return l2x0_of_init((2 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_WAY_SIZE_SHIFT) | > + (1 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_ASSOCIATIVITY_SHIFT), > + L2X0_AUX_CTRL_MASK); > + } > + > return 0; > } > early_initcall(sirfsoc_l2x0_init); Rather than individually testing each match against the table, could you not place the configuration values in a struct, and map to this with of_device_id::data? Thanks, Mark.
2013/1/2, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:13:53PM +0000, Barry Song wrote: >> From: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com> >> >> prima2 and marco have diffetent l2 cache configuration, so >> we initialize l2x0 cache based on dtb given to kernel. >> >> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c >> index c998377..909cc6f 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c >> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ static struct of_device_id prima2_l2x0_ids[] = { >> {}, >> }; >> >> +static struct of_device_id marco_l2x0_ids[] = { >> + { .compatible = "sirf,marco-pl310-cache" }, >> + {}, >> +}; >> + >> static int __init sirfsoc_l2x0_init(void) >> { >> struct device_node *np; >> @@ -26,6 +31,15 @@ static int __init sirfsoc_l2x0_init(void) >> return l2x0_of_init(0x40000, 0); >> } >> >> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, marco_l2x0_ids); >> + if (np) { >> + pr_info("Initializing marco L2 cache\n"); >> + /* Way size: 32KB Associativity: 16-way */ >> + return l2x0_of_init((2 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_WAY_SIZE_SHIFT) | >> + (1 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_ASSOCIATIVITY_SHIFT), >> + L2X0_AUX_CTRL_MASK); >> + } >> + >> return 0; >> } >> early_initcall(sirfsoc_l2x0_init); > > Rather than individually testing each match against the table, could you > not > place the configuration values in a struct, and map to this with > of_device_id::data? ok. good idea. > > Thanks, > Mark. > -barry
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c index c998377..909cc6f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ static struct of_device_id prima2_l2x0_ids[] = { {}, }; +static struct of_device_id marco_l2x0_ids[] = { + { .compatible = "sirf,marco-pl310-cache" }, + {}, +}; + static int __init sirfsoc_l2x0_init(void) { struct device_node *np; @@ -26,6 +31,15 @@ static int __init sirfsoc_l2x0_init(void) return l2x0_of_init(0x40000, 0); } + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, marco_l2x0_ids); + if (np) { + pr_info("Initializing marco L2 cache\n"); + /* Way size: 32KB Associativity: 16-way */ + return l2x0_of_init((2 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_WAY_SIZE_SHIFT) | + (1 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_ASSOCIATIVITY_SHIFT), + L2X0_AUX_CTRL_MASK); + } + return 0; } early_initcall(sirfsoc_l2x0_init);