diff mbox

[RFC,1/5] ARM i.MX6q: Add GPU, VPU, IPU, and OpenVG resets to system reset controller

Message ID 1357751839-19680-2-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Philipp Zabel Jan. 9, 2013, 5:17 p.m. UTC
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt      |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c                            |   41 ++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/imx-src.h                            |    6 +++
 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt
 create mode 100644 include/linux/imx-src.h

Comments

Stephen Warren Jan. 9, 2013, 6:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On 01/09/2013 10:17 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt      |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++

I proposed something very similar a while back; it may be useful to look
at the previous discussion there:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg202451.html

Unfortunately, I haven't had time to follow up on the proposal.
Shawn Guo Jan. 10, 2013, 6:56 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Philipp,

On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 06:17:15PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt      |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c                            |   41 ++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/imx-src.h                            |    6 +++
>  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/imx-src.h

I'm with Stephen that we should try to create a common API for this.
Instead of ask device drivers to call IMX specific imx_src_reset(),
we should have them call some type of common API with struct device
as the argument.  And the work of calling of_parse_phandle_with_args()
should be done inside the API.  It's pointless to ask every single
client driver to do this same work.

Shawn
Philipp Zabel Jan. 10, 2013, 1:51 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Stephen,

Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 11:15 -0700 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> On 01/09/2013 10:17 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt      |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> I proposed something very similar a while back; it may be useful to look
> at the previous discussion there:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg202451.html

Thanks, I had started playing around with some "reset subsystem"
patches, but so far shied away from what feels like a whole lot of code
for little effect. I came to the same conclusion that replacing gpio
resets would probably be overkill, but I was only peripherally aware of
the tegra reset controller.
So a simple common struct and some oftree parsing code in drivers/reset
that can replace both the proposed imx patch and what
tegra_periph_reset_* do would be considered useful?

> Unfortunately, I haven't had time to follow up on the proposal.

regards
Philipp
Philipp Zabel Jan. 10, 2013, 1:54 p.m. UTC | #4
Am Donnerstag, den 10.01.2013, 14:56 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
> Hi Philipp,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 06:17:15PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt      |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c                            |   41 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/imx-src.h                            |    6 +++
> >  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/imx-src.h
> 
> I'm with Stephen that we should try to create a common API for this.
> Instead of ask device drivers to call IMX specific imx_src_reset(),
> we should have them call some type of common API with struct device
> as the argument.

Agreed. At least for devices with a single dedicated reset line this
would be a much better API.

regards
Philipp
Stephen Warren Jan. 10, 2013, 6:19 p.m. UTC | #5
On 01/10/2013 06:51 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 11:15 -0700 schrieb Stephen Warren:
>> On 01/09/2013 10:17 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt      |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> I proposed something very similar a while back; it may be useful to look
>> at the previous discussion there:
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg202451.html
> 
> Thanks, I had started playing around with some "reset subsystem"
> patches, but so far shied away from what feels like a whole lot of code
> for little effect. I came to the same conclusion that replacing gpio
> resets would probably be overkill, but I was only peripherally aware of
> the tegra reset controller.

> So a simple common struct and some oftree parsing code in drivers/reset
> that can replace both the proposed imx patch and what
> tegra_periph_reset_* do would be considered useful?

Yes, I didn't really imagine the "reset subsystem" would do more than
parsing the DT property that represented the reset and look up the
registered reset controller and reset ID. Plus, provide some central
function to pass the parsed reset ID to the reset controller driver. Of
course, if it expanded to cover non-DT cases it might get more complex,
but that can always be added later.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8f1e66a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx-src.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ 
+Freescale i.MX System Reset Controller
+======================================
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: Should be "fsl,<chip>-src"
+- reg: should be register base and length as documented in the
+  datasheet
+- interrupts: Should contain SRC interrupt and CPU WDOG interrupt,
+  in this order.
+- #reset-cells: 1, see below
+
+example:
+
+src: src@020d8000 {
+        compatible = "fsl,imx6q-src";
+        reg = <0x020d8000 0x4000>;
+        interrupts = <0 91 0x04 0 96 0x04>;
+        #reset-cells = <1>;
+};
+
+Specifying reset lines connected to IP modules
+==============================================
+
+The system reset controller can be used to reset the GPU, VPU,
+IPU, and OpenVG IP modules on i.MX5 and i.MX6 ICs. Those device
+nodes should specify the reset line on the SRC in their reset
+property, containing a phandle to the SRC device node and a
+RESET_INDEX specifying which module to reset.
+
+example:
+
+        ipu0: ipu0 {
+                reset = <&src 2>;
+        };
+        ipu1: ipu1 {
+                reset = <&src 4>;
+        };
+
+The following RESET_INDEX values are valid for i.MX5:
+GPU_RESET     0
+VPU_RESET     1
+IPU1_RESET    2
+OPEN_VG_RESET 3
+The following additional RESET_INDEX value is valid for i.MX6:
+IPU2_RESET    4
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c
index e15f155..10658b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/src.c
@@ -20,11 +20,52 @@ 
 #define SRC_SCR				0x000
 #define SRC_GPR1			0x020
 #define BP_SRC_SCR_WARM_RESET_ENABLE	0
+#define BP_SRC_SCR_SW_GPU_RST		1
+#define BP_SRC_SCR_SW_VPU_RST		2
+#define BP_SRC_SCR_SW_IPU1_RST		3
+#define BP_SRC_SCR_SW_OPEN_VG_RST	4
+#define BP_SRC_SCR_SW_IPU2_RST		12
 #define BP_SRC_SCR_CORE1_RST		14
 #define BP_SRC_SCR_CORE1_ENABLE		22
 
 static void __iomem *src_base;
 
+static int sw_reset_bits[5] = {
+	BP_SRC_SCR_SW_GPU_RST,
+	BP_SRC_SCR_SW_VPU_RST,
+	BP_SRC_SCR_SW_IPU1_RST,
+	BP_SRC_SCR_SW_OPEN_VG_RST,
+	BP_SRC_SCR_SW_IPU2_RST
+};
+
+int imx_src_reset(int sw_reset_idx)
+{
+	unsigned long timeout;
+	int bit;
+	u32 val;
+
+	if (!src_base)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	if (sw_reset_idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(sw_reset_bits))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	bit = 1 << sw_reset_bits[sw_reset_idx];
+
+	val = readl_relaxed(src_base + SRC_SCR);
+	val |= bit;
+	writel_relaxed(val, src_base + SRC_SCR);
+
+	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1000);
+	while (readl(src_base + SRC_SCR) & bit) {
+		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
+			return -ETIME;
+		cpu_relax();
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 void imx_enable_cpu(int cpu, bool enable)
 {
 	u32 mask, val;
diff --git a/include/linux/imx-src.h b/include/linux/imx-src.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b93ed96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/imx-src.h
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ 
+#ifndef __IMX_SRC_H__
+#define __IMX_SRC_H__
+
+extern int imx_src_reset(int sw_reset_idx);
+
+#endif /* __IMX_SRC_H__ */