| Message ID | 1359041366.21576.146.camel@gandalf.local.home (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:29:26AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Building for the snowball board, I ran into this compile failure:
Applied, thanks. Please use subject lines appropriate for the subsystem
(I see I let the original one through).
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 15:31 +0800, Mark Brown wrote: > Applied, thanks. Please use subject lines appropriate for the subsystem > (I see I let the original one through). Heh, when making patches for other subsystems, I look at the subject of the patch that broke to determine what to use. -- Steve
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c b/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c index 261f3d2..89bd2fa 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include <linux/debugfs.h> #include <linux/seq_file.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/module.h> #include "dbx500-prcmu.h"
Building for the snowball board, I ran into this compile failure: CC drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.o arm-test.git/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c:119:11: error: 'THIS_MODULE' undeclared here (not in a function) make[3]: *** [drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [drivers/regulator] Error 2 Commit 38e968380 "regulators/db8500: split off shared dbx500 code" separated out the dbx500 code but did not copy over the required include to linux/module.h. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>