Message ID | 1360602659-4774-3-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> wrote: > If index++ calculates from 0, the checking condition of "while > (index++)" fails & it doesn't check any more. It doesn't follow > the loop that used at here. > > Replace it by endless loop at here. Then it keeps parsing > "gpio-ranges" property until it ends. > > Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Grant can you pick this patch (and the other one, 01/12)? I would stack them in my tree unless there was such deep-core OF business involved, which makes me insecure. Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c index 380f84e..dae24c0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip) if (!np) return; - do { + for (;; index++) { ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "gpio-ranges", "#gpio-range-cells", index, &pinspec); if (ret) @@ -246,8 +246,7 @@ static void of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip) if (ret) break; - - } while (index++); + } } #else