From patchwork Wed Mar 13 10:48:08 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paul Bolle X-Patchwork-Id: 2262721 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888A63FCF6 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UFjEU-0002MA-Vj; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:48:30 +0000 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews07.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.10]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UFjER-0002Ls-6O for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:48:28 +0000 Received: from cpsps-ews29.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.195]) by cpsmtpb-ews07.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:46:40 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.5]) by cpsps-ews29.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:46:40 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.123.139.93]) by CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:48:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1363171688.3137.196.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Subject: ARM: at-91: ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 went missing From: Paul Bolle To: Andrew Victor , Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Russell King Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:48:08 +0100 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 (3.4.4-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2013 10:48:08.0658 (UTC) FILETIME=[3FF28B20:01CE1FD8] X-RcptDomain: lists.infradead.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20130313_064827_354567_B0B5D6F3 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.50 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-1.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (pebolle[at]tiscali.nl) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.10 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org 0) Commit 1e3ce2b8545390a2aee8dbfcd49ca4161b636000 ("AR[M]: at91: introduce SOC_AT91xxx define to allow to compile SoC core support") dropped the Kconfig symbol ARCH_AT91SAM9X5. It seems it missed something like this: 1) But before I submit something along those lines: ARCH_AT91* variants are still used quite a bit around the tree (both as Kconfig symbols and as Kconfig macros). How are the current SOC_AT91* symbols wired back to the old ARCH_AT91* symbols? Or are those old symbols and macros _only_ needed for backwards compatibility? Paul Bolle diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig index 6071f4c..2db5370 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ config ARCH_AT91SAM9G45 bool "AT91SAM9G45" select SOC_AT91SAM9G45 +config ARCH_AT91SAM9X5 + bool "AT91SAM9X5" + select SOC_AT91SAM9X5 + config ARCH_AT91X40 bool "AT91x40" depends on !MMU