Message ID | 1363235701-21342-1-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:35:01PM +0900, kpark3469@gmail.com wrote: > From: Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com> > > This makes return_address() return a correct value for CALLER_ADDRn. > To have a correct value from CALLER_ADDRn, we need to fix three points. > > * The unwind_frame() does not update frame->lr but frame->pc for backtrace. > So frame->pc is meaningful for backtrace. > > * data.level should be adjusted by adding 2 additional iteration levels. > With the current +1 level adjustment, the result of CALLER_ADDR1 will > be the same return address with CALLER_ADDR0. > > * The initialization of data.addr to NULL is needed. > When unwind_fame() fails right after data.level reaches zero, > the routine returns data.addr which has uninitialized garbage value. > > Signed-off-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com> > Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org> Please send this to the patch system. I think we should let this sit in -next for a bit (which we'll get anyway) to see what the effect is.
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c index 8085417..fafedd8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static int save_return_addr(struct stackframe *frame, void *d) struct return_address_data *data = d; if (!data->level) { - data->addr = (void *)frame->lr; + data->addr = (void *)frame->pc; return 1; } else { @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ void *return_address(unsigned int level) struct stackframe frame; register unsigned long current_sp asm ("sp"); - data.level = level + 1; + data.level = level + 2; + data.addr = NULL; frame.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0); frame.sp = current_sp;