diff mbox

[4/4] mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram

Message ID 1366712997-17639-5-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Josh Wu April 23, 2013, 10:29 a.m. UTC
This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU
overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC.

This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and
mtd-utils.

Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC
writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed.

- commands use to test:
  # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 &
  # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest

- test result:
diff mbox

Patch

=================================================
mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2
mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64
mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed
  509   495 root     D     1164   0%   7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2
  509   495 root     D     1164   0%   8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2
  509   495 root     R     1164   0%   5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2
mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s
mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed
  509   495 root     D     1164   0%  32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2
  509   495 root     D     1164   0%  27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2
  509   495 root     D     1164   0%  25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2
  509   495 root     D     1164   0%  30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2
mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s

Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c |   90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
index d16cd2e..56e36ba 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@  struct atmel_nfc {
 
 	/* Point to the sram bank which include readed data via NFC */
 	void __iomem		*data_in_sram;
+	bool			will_write_sram;
 };
 
 struct atmel_nand_host {
@@ -218,6 +219,16 @@  static void memcpy32_fromio(void *trg, const void __iomem  *src, size_t size)
 		*t++ = readl_relaxed(s++);
 }
 
+static void memcpy32_toio(void __iomem *trg, const void *src, int size)
+{
+	int i;
+	u32 __iomem *t = trg;
+	const u32 *s = src;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < (size >> 2); i++)
+		writel_relaxed(*s++, t++);
+}
+
 /*
  * Minimal-overhead PIO for data access.
  */
@@ -339,7 +350,11 @@  static int atmel_nand_dma_op(struct mtd_info *mtd, void *buf, int len,
 		dma_dst_addr = phys_addr;
 	} else {
 		dma_src_addr = phys_addr;
-		dma_dst_addr = host->io_phys;
+
+		if (host->use_nfc_sram)
+			dma_dst_addr = nfc_sram_phys(host);
+		else
+			dma_dst_addr = host->io_phys;
 	}
 
 	tx = dma_dev->device_prep_dma_memcpy(host->dma_chan, dma_dst_addr,
@@ -914,9 +929,10 @@  static int atmel_nand_pmecc_write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
 	int i, j;
 	unsigned long end_time;
 
-	pmecc_enable(host, PMECC_WRITE);
-
-	chip->write_buf(mtd, (u8 *)buf, mtd->writesize);
+	if (!host->use_nfc_sram) {
+		pmecc_enable(host, PMECC_WRITE);
+		chip->write_buf(mtd, (u8 *)buf, mtd->writesize);
+	}
 
 	end_time = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(PMECC_MAX_TIMEOUT_MS);
 	while ((pmecc_readl_relaxed(host->ecc, SR) & PMECC_SR_BUSY)) {
@@ -1800,6 +1816,8 @@  static void nfc_nand_command(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
 	case NAND_CMD_SEQIN:
 	case NAND_CMD_RNDIN:
 		nfcwr = NFCADDR_CMD_NFCWR;
+		if (host->nfc.will_write_sram && command == NAND_CMD_SEQIN)
+			dataen = NFCADDR_CMD_DATAEN;
 		break;
 	default:
 		break;
@@ -1854,6 +1872,64 @@  static void nfc_nand_command(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
 	}
 }
 
+static int nfc_sram_write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
+			   const uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page,
+			   int cached, int raw)
+{
+	int cfg, len;
+	int status = 0;
+	struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
+	void __iomem *sram = host->nfc.sram_bank0 + nfc_get_sram_off(host);
+
+	cfg = nfc_readl(host->nfc.hsmc_regs, CFG);
+	len = mtd->writesize;
+
+	if (unlikely(raw)) {
+		len += mtd->oobsize;
+		nfc_writel(host->nfc.hsmc_regs, CFG, cfg | ATMEL_HSMC_WSPARE);
+	} else
+		nfc_writel(host->nfc.hsmc_regs, CFG, cfg & ~ATMEL_HSMC_WSPARE);
+
+	/* Copy page data to sram that will write to nand via NFC */
+	if (use_dma) {
+		if (atmel_nand_dma_op(mtd, (void *)buf, len, 0) != 0)
+			/* Fall back to use cpu copy */
+			memcpy32_toio(sram, buf, len);
+	} else {
+		memcpy32_toio(sram, buf, len);
+	}
+
+	if (chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW && host->has_pmecc)
+		/*
+		 * When use NFC sram, need set up PMECC before send
+		 * NAND_CMD_SEQIN command. Since when the nand command
+		 * is sent, nfc will do transfer from sram and nand.
+		 */
+		pmecc_enable(host, PMECC_WRITE);
+
+	host->nfc.will_write_sram = true;
+	chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_SEQIN, 0x00, page);
+	host->nfc.will_write_sram = false;
+
+	if (likely(!raw))
+		/* Need to write ecc into oob */
+		status = chip->ecc.write_page(mtd, chip, buf, oob_required);
+
+	if (status < 0)
+		return status;
+
+	chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG, -1, -1);
+	status = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);
+
+	if ((status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) && (chip->errstat))
+		status = chip->errstat(mtd, chip, FL_WRITING, status, page);
+
+	if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL)
+		return -EIO;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int nfc_sram_init(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 {
 	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
@@ -1892,10 +1968,16 @@  static int nfc_sram_init(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 
 	nfc_writel(host->nfc.hsmc_regs, CFG, cfg_nfc);
 
+	host->nfc.will_write_sram = false;
 	nfc_set_sram_bank(host, 0);
 
 	dev_info(host->dev, "Using NFC Sram\n");
 
+	/* Use Write page with NFC SRAM only for PMECC or ECC NONE. */
+	if ((chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW && host->has_pmecc) ||
+			chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_NONE)
+		chip->write_page = nfc_sram_write_page;
+
 	return 0;
 }