Message ID | 1370182855-13427-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 02.06.2013 16:20, Shawn Guo wrote: > If the current rate of parent clock is sufficient to provide child a > requested rate with a proper divider setting, the rate change request > should not be propagated. Instead, changing the divider setting is good > enough to get child clock run at the requested rate. > > On an imx6q clock configuration illustrated below, > > ahb --> ipg --> ipg_per > 132M 66M 66M > > calling clk_set_rate(ipg_per, 22M) with the current > clk_divider_bestdiv() implementation will result in the rate change up > to ahb level like the following, because of the unnecessary/incorrect > rate change propagation. > > ahb --> ipg --> ipg_per > 66M 22M 22M > > Fix the problem by trying to see if the requested rate can be achieved > by simply changing the divider value, and in that case return the > divider immediately from function clk_divider_bestdiv() as the best > one, so that all those unnecessary rate change propagation can be saved. > > Reported-by: Anson Huang <b20788@freescale.com> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c > index 6d96741..6024e60 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c > @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); > int i, bestdiv = 0; > unsigned long parent_rate, best = 0, now, maxdiv; > + unsigned long parent_rate_saved = *best_parent_rate; > > if (!rate) > rate = 1; > @@ -173,6 +174,15 @@ static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > for (i = 1; i <= maxdiv; i++) { > if (!_is_valid_div(divider, i)) > continue; > + if (rate * i == parent_rate_saved) { > + /* > + * It's the most ideal case if the requested rate can be > + * divided from parent clock without needing to change > + * parent rate, so return the divider immediately. > + */ > + *best_parent_rate = parent_rate_saved; > + return i; > + } > parent_rate = __clk_round_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk), > MULT_ROUND_UP(rate, i)); > now = parent_rate / i; > Is this ready to be applied? Thanks Dirk
Quoting Shawn Guo (2013-06-02 07:20:55) > If the current rate of parent clock is sufficient to provide child a > requested rate with a proper divider setting, the rate change request > should not be propagated. Instead, changing the divider setting is good > enough to get child clock run at the requested rate. > > On an imx6q clock configuration illustrated below, > > ahb --> ipg --> ipg_per > 132M 66M 66M > > calling clk_set_rate(ipg_per, 22M) with the current > clk_divider_bestdiv() implementation will result in the rate change up > to ahb level like the following, because of the unnecessary/incorrect > rate change propagation. > > ahb --> ipg --> ipg_per > 66M 22M 22M > > Fix the problem by trying to see if the requested rate can be achieved > by simply changing the divider value, and in that case return the > divider immediately from function clk_divider_bestdiv() as the best > one, so that all those unnecessary rate change propagation can be saved. > > Reported-by: Anson Huang <b20788@freescale.com> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> I've taken this into clk-next. I'm keeping an eye out for any regressions this change might cause. Any help testing it would be appreciated. Regards, Mike > --- > drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c > index 6d96741..6024e60 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c > @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); > int i, bestdiv = 0; > unsigned long parent_rate, best = 0, now, maxdiv; > + unsigned long parent_rate_saved = *best_parent_rate; > > if (!rate) > rate = 1; > @@ -173,6 +174,15 @@ static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > for (i = 1; i <= maxdiv; i++) { > if (!_is_valid_div(divider, i)) > continue; > + if (rate * i == parent_rate_saved) { > + /* > + * It's the most ideal case if the requested rate can be > + * divided from parent clock without needing to change > + * parent rate, so return the divider immediately. > + */ > + *best_parent_rate = parent_rate_saved; > + return i; > + } > parent_rate = __clk_round_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk), > MULT_ROUND_UP(rate, i)); > now = parent_rate / i; > -- > 1.7.9.5
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c index 6d96741..6024e60 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); int i, bestdiv = 0; unsigned long parent_rate, best = 0, now, maxdiv; + unsigned long parent_rate_saved = *best_parent_rate; if (!rate) rate = 1; @@ -173,6 +174,15 @@ static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, for (i = 1; i <= maxdiv; i++) { if (!_is_valid_div(divider, i)) continue; + if (rate * i == parent_rate_saved) { + /* + * It's the most ideal case if the requested rate can be + * divided from parent clock without needing to change + * parent rate, so return the divider immediately. + */ + *best_parent_rate = parent_rate_saved; + return i; + } parent_rate = __clk_round_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk), MULT_ROUND_UP(rate, i)); now = parent_rate / i;
If the current rate of parent clock is sufficient to provide child a requested rate with a proper divider setting, the rate change request should not be propagated. Instead, changing the divider setting is good enough to get child clock run at the requested rate. On an imx6q clock configuration illustrated below, ahb --> ipg --> ipg_per 132M 66M 66M calling clk_set_rate(ipg_per, 22M) with the current clk_divider_bestdiv() implementation will result in the rate change up to ahb level like the following, because of the unnecessary/incorrect rate change propagation. ahb --> ipg --> ipg_per 66M 22M 22M Fix the problem by trying to see if the requested rate can be achieved by simply changing the divider value, and in that case return the divider immediately from function clk_divider_bestdiv() as the best one, so that all those unnecessary rate change propagation can be saved. Reported-by: Anson Huang <b20788@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> --- drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)