| Message ID | 1375610330-18185-6-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Linus, On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 11:58:46AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Some pin functions in the array were not indented like the other > functions in this array. Fix this. Could you please take this trivial patch for 3.12? Thanks, Maxime
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 11:58:46AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Some pin functions in the array were not indented like the other > > functions in this array. Fix this. > > Could you please take this trivial patch for 3.12? Ping?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Some pin functions in the array were not indented like the other > functions in this array. Fix this. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Patch applied. Since the reply mentions that you want me to apply it I did so. And I assume you want to take the two others so I applied those as well. The thing that made it take time was partly that it was part of a multi-patch set and I couldn't figure out how that was going to be merged and as there were comments on the other patches in the set I assume the whole thing will be respun. But whatever, I applied these three patches now, tell me if there are more of them. Yours, Linus Walleij
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:49:58PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > > Some pin functions in the array were not indented like the other > > functions in this array. Fix this. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > Patch applied. > > Since the reply mentions that you want me to apply it I > did so. > > And I assume you want to take the two others so I > applied those as well. > > The thing that made it take time was partly that it > was part of a multi-patch set and I couldn't figure out > how that was going to be merged and as there were > comments on the other patches in the set I assume > the whole thing will be respun. > > But whatever, I applied these three patches now, > tell me if there are more of them. Great, thanks! :) Maxime
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi-pins.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi-pins.h index 3368965..2c7446a 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi-pins.h +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi-pins.h @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_desc_pin sun4i_a10_pins[] = { SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x3, "pata"), /* ATAD13 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x4, "keypad"), /* IN7 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x5, "sim"), /* VCCEN */ - SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ(0x6, 17), /* EINT17 */ + SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ(0x6, 17), /* EINT17 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x7, "csi1")), /* D17 */ SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN_PH18, SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"), @@ -815,7 +815,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_desc_pin sun4i_a10_pins[] = { SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x3, "pata"), /* ATAD14 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x4, "keypad"), /* OUT0 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x5, "sim"), /* SCK */ - SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ(0x6, 18), /* EINT18 */ + SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ(0x6, 18), /* EINT18 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x7, "csi1")), /* D18 */ SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN_PH19, SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"), @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_desc_pin sun4i_a10_pins[] = { SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x3, "pata"), /* ATAD15 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x4, "keypad"), /* OUT1 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x5, "sim"), /* SDA */ - SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ(0x6, 19), /* EINT19 */ + SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ(0x6, 19), /* EINT19 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x7, "csi1")), /* D19 */ SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN_PH20, SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"), @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_desc_pin sun4i_a10_pins[] = { SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "lcd1"), /* D20 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x3, "pata"), /* ATAOE */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x4, "can"), /* TX */ - SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ(0x6, 20), /* EINT20 */ + SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ(0x6, 20), /* EINT20 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x7, "csi1")), /* D20 */ SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN_PH21, SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"), @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_desc_pin sun4i_a10_pins[] = { SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "lcd1"), /* D21 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x3, "pata"), /* ATADREQ */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x4, "can"), /* RX */ - SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ(0x6, 21), /* EINT21 */ + SUNXI_FUNCTION_IRQ(0x6, 21), /* EINT21 */ SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x7, "csi1")), /* D21 */ SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN_PH22, SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"),
Some pin functions in the array were not indented like the other functions in this array. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi-pins.h | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)