| Message ID | 1375858358-15070-3-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 08/07/2013 12:52 AM, Wei Ni wrote:
> Enable thermal sensor nct1008 for t114 dalmore.
Wei, I assume this patch doesn't depend on any of the other LM90-related
patches you've sent; I can simply apply it right away?
Is the LM90 DT binding fully documented somewhere, including the
vdd-supply property?
On 08/08/2013 12:03 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/07/2013 12:52 AM, Wei Ni wrote: >> Enable thermal sensor nct1008 for t114 dalmore. > > Wei, I assume this patch doesn't depend on any of the other LM90-related > patches you've sent; I can simply apply it right away? In my [PATCH 1/2], I add codes to get the vdd regulator and enable it, so if without it, the lm90 can't work properly on Dalmore, although it can be loaded. I think it's better to wait my fist patch applied. > > Is the LM90 DT binding fully documented somewhere, including the > vdd-supply property? No LM90 DT binding document yet, I will add it in my next version. >
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts index b5a42f0..9d4d2b2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts @@ -738,6 +738,14 @@ realtek,ldo1-en-gpios = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(V, 3) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; }; + + nct1008 { + compatible = "onnn,nct1008"; + reg = <0x4c>; + vdd-supply = <&palmas_ldo6_reg>; + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(O, 4) IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + }; }; i2c@7000d000 { @@ -945,7 +953,7 @@ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; }; - ldo6 { + palmas_ldo6_reg: ldo6 { regulator-name = "vdd-sensor-2v85"; regulator-min-microvolt = <2850000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <2850000>;
Enable thermal sensor nct1008 for t114 dalmore. Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)