Message ID | 1376586580-5409-3-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 15/08/13 18:09, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: > From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> > > This patch removes the declaration of the function 'of_get_cpu_node' > which is not defined for openrisc. This is in preparation to move > it's definition from PPC to DT common code. > > Again it could be there as it was originally copied from powerpc. > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> > Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Hi Jonas, Since both microblaze and openrisc have moderated lists which I am not member of, these patches were blocked. Michal Simek agreed to remove this for microblaze. Do you see any concern with this patch for openrisc ? Can I have you ACK if it looks fine ? Regards, Sudeep > --- > arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h > index bbb34e5..eb59bfe 100644 > --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h > +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h > @@ -44,9 +44,6 @@ void of_parse_dma_window(struct device_node *dn, const void *dma_window_prop, > > extern void kdump_move_device_tree(void); > > -/* CPU OF node matching */ > -struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread); > - > /* Get the MAC address */ > extern const void *of_get_mac_address(struct device_node *np); > >
On 08/16/13 11:41, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: > On 15/08/13 18:09, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> >> >> This patch removes the declaration of the function 'of_get_cpu_node' >> which is not defined for openrisc. This is in preparation to move >> it's definition from PPC to DT common code. >> >> Again it could be there as it was originally copied from powerpc. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> >> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> > Hi Jonas, > > Since both microblaze and openrisc have moderated lists which I am not > member of, these patches were blocked. Michal Simek agreed to remove > this for microblaze. Do you see any concern with this patch for openrisc > ? Can I have you ACK if it looks fine ? Hi Sudeep, Yes, thanks, the patch looks good. Acked-by: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> /Jonas > > Regards, > Sudeep >> --- >> arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h | 3 --- >> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h >> index bbb34e5..eb59bfe 100644 >> --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h >> +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h >> @@ -44,9 +44,6 @@ void of_parse_dma_window(struct device_node *dn, const void *dma_window_prop, >> >> extern void kdump_move_device_tree(void); >> >> -/* CPU OF node matching */ >> -struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread); >> - >> /* Get the MAC address */ >> extern const void *of_get_mac_address(struct device_node *np); >> >> >
diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h index bbb34e5..eb59bfe 100644 --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h @@ -44,9 +44,6 @@ void of_parse_dma_window(struct device_node *dn, const void *dma_window_prop, extern void kdump_move_device_tree(void); -/* CPU OF node matching */ -struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread); - /* Get the MAC address */ extern const void *of_get_mac_address(struct device_node *np);