From patchwork Thu Aug 29 23:05:43 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Joel Fernandes X-Patchwork-Id: 2851639 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C319C0AB5 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F25B20497 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [85.118.1.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7419B203E1 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([2001:4978:20e::2]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VFBIU-000442-5M; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:06:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VFBIR-0004BF-PA; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:06:35 +0000 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VFBIN-00049d-PI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:06:33 +0000 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by bear.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r7TN60fv023340; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:06:00 -0500 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7TN60vb020732; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:06:00 -0500 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DFLE72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:06:00 -0500 Received: from joel-laptop.itg.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7TN5j0c030581; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:05:59 -0500 From: Joel Fernandes To: Sekhar Nori , Matt Porter , Vinod Koul , Dan Williams , Russell King , Sricharan R Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] dma: edma: Find missed events and issue them Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:05:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1377817545-18015-5-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 In-Reply-To: <1377817545-18015-1-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com> References: <1377817545-18015-1-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20130829_190631_990799_A86A9A4C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.00 ) X-Spam-Score: -9.4 (---------) Cc: Linux DaVinci Kernel List , Joel Fernandes , Koen Kooi , Linux MMC List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Franklin Cooper , Linux OMAP List , Linux ARM Kernel List X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP In an effort to move to using Scatter gather lists of any size with EDMA as discussed at [1] instead of placing limitations on the driver, we work through the limitations of the EDMAC hardware to find missed events and issue them. The sequence of events that require this are: For the scenario where MAX slots for an EDMA channel is 3: SG1 -> SG2 -> SG3 -> SG4 -> SG5 -> SG6 -> Null The above SG list will have to be DMA'd in 2 sets: (1) SG1 -> SG2 -> SG3 -> Null (2) SG4 -> SG5 -> SG6 -> Null After (1) is succesfully transferred, the events from the MMC controller donot stop coming and are missed by the time we have setup the transfer for (2). So here, we catch the events missed as an error condition and issue them manually. In the second part of the patch, we make handle the NULL slot cases: For crypto IP, we continue to receive events even continuously in NULL slot, the setup of the next set of SG elements happens after the error handler executes. This is results in some recursion problems. Due to this, we continously receive error interrupts when we manually trigger an event from the error handler. We fix this, by first detecting if the Channel is currently transferring from a NULL slot or not, that's where the edma_read_slot in the error callback from interrupt handler comes in. With this we can determine if the set up of the next SG list has completed, and we manually trigger only in this case. If the setup has _not_ completed, we are still in NULL so we just set a missed flag and allow the manual triggerring to happen in edma_execute which will be eventually called. This fixes the above mentioned race conditions seen with the crypto drivers. [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=137416733628831&w=2 Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes --- drivers/dma/edma.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c index 732829b..0e77b57 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/edma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct edma_chan { int ch_num; bool alloced; int slot[EDMA_MAX_SLOTS]; + int missed; struct dma_slave_config cfg; }; @@ -170,6 +171,20 @@ static void edma_execute(struct edma_chan *echan) dev_dbg(dev, "first transfer starting %d\n", echan->ch_num); edma_start(echan->ch_num); } + + /* + * This happens due to setup times between intermediate transfers + * in long SG lists which have to be broken up into transfers of + * MAX_NR_SG + */ + if (echan->missed) { + dev_dbg(dev, "missed event in execute detected\n"); + edma_clean_channel(echan->ch_num); + edma_stop(echan->ch_num); + edma_start(echan->ch_num); + edma_trigger_channel(echan->ch_num); + echan->missed = 0; + } } static int edma_terminate_all(struct edma_chan *echan) @@ -387,6 +402,7 @@ static void edma_callback(unsigned ch_num, u16 ch_status, void *data) struct device *dev = echan->vchan.chan.device->dev; struct edma_desc *edesc; unsigned long flags; + struct edmacc_param p; /* Pause the channel */ edma_pause(echan->ch_num); @@ -414,7 +430,39 @@ static void edma_callback(unsigned ch_num, u16 ch_status, void *data) break; case DMA_CC_ERROR: - dev_dbg(dev, "transfer error on channel %d\n", ch_num); + spin_lock_irqsave(&echan->vchan.lock, flags); + + edma_read_slot(EDMA_CHAN_SLOT(echan->slot[0]), &p); + + /* + * Issue later based on missed flag which will be sure + * to happen as: + * (1) we finished transmitting an intermediate slot and + * edma_execute is coming up. + * (2) or we finished current transfer and issue will + * call edma_execute. + * + * Important note: issuing can be dangerous here and + * lead to some nasty recursion when we are in a NULL + * slot. So we avoid doing so and set the missed flag. + */ + if (p.a_b_cnt == 0 && p.ccnt == 0) { + dev_dbg(dev, "Error occurred, looks like slot is null, just setting miss\n"); + echan->missed = 1; + } else { + /* + * The slot is already programmed but the event got + * missed, so its safe to issue it here. + */ + dev_dbg(dev, "Error occurred but slot is non-null, TRIGGERING\n"); + edma_clean_channel(echan->ch_num); + edma_stop(echan->ch_num); + edma_start(echan->ch_num); + edma_trigger_channel(echan->ch_num); + } + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&echan->vchan.lock, flags); + break; default: break;