diff mbox

[v2,3/4] tick: broadcast: Deny per-cpu clockevents from being broadcast sources

Message ID 1379530118-22813-4-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Soren Brinkmann Sept. 18, 2013, 6:48 p.m. UTC
On most ARM systems the per-cpu clockevents are truly per-cpu in
the sense that they can't be controlled on any other CPU besides
the CPU that they interrupt. If one of these clockevents were to
become a broadcast source we will run into a lot of trouble
because the broadcast source is enabled on the first CPU to go
into deep idle (if that CPU suffers from FEAT_C3_STOP) and that
could be a different CPU than what the clockevent is interrupting
(or even worse the CPU that the clockevent interrupts could be
offline).

Theoretically it's possible to support per-cpu clockevents as the
broadcast source but so far we haven't needed this and supporting
it is rather complicated. Let's just deny the possibility for now
until this becomes a reality (let's hope it never does!).

Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
---
 kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Daniel Lezcano Sept. 25, 2013, 3:11 p.m. UTC | #1
On 09/18/2013 08:48 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> On most ARM systems the per-cpu clockevents are truly per-cpu in
> the sense that they can't be controlled on any other CPU besides
> the CPU that they interrupt. If one of these clockevents were to
> become a broadcast source we will run into a lot of trouble
> because the broadcast source is enabled on the first CPU to go
> into deep idle (if that CPU suffers from FEAT_C3_STOP) and that
> could be a different CPU than what the clockevent is interrupting
> (or even worse the CPU that the clockevent interrupts could be
> offline).
> 
> Theoretically it's possible to support per-cpu clockevents as the
> broadcast source but so far we haven't needed this and supporting
> it is rather complicated. Let's just deny the possibility for now
> until this becomes a reality (let's hope it never does!).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

> ---
>  kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> index 218bcb5..9532690 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static bool tick_check_broadcast_device(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
>  					struct clock_event_device *newdev)
>  {
>  	if ((newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DUMMY) ||
> +	    (newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERCPU) ||
>  	    (newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP))
>  		return false;
>  
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
index 218bcb5..9532690 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@  static bool tick_check_broadcast_device(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
 					struct clock_event_device *newdev)
 {
 	if ((newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DUMMY) ||
+	    (newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERCPU) ||
 	    (newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP))
 		return false;