diff mbox

[1/2] ARM: at91: cpuidle: convert to platform driver

Message ID 1381593099-1184-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Daniel Lezcano Oct. 12, 2013, 3:51 p.m. UTC
Use the platform driver model to separate the cpuidle specific code from
the low level pm code. It allows to remove the dependency between
these two components.

Tested-on usb-a9263 (at91sam9263)

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c |   29 +++++++++++++++--------------
 arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c      |   16 +++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Oct. 14, 2013, 2:04 p.m. UTC | #1
On 17:51 Sat 12 Oct     , Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Use the platform driver model to separate the cpuidle specific code from
> the low level pm code. It allows to remove the dependency between
> these two components.
> 
> Tested-on usb-a9263 (at91sam9263)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c |   29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c      |   16 +++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
> index 4ec6a6d..6cdc76d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
> @@ -21,26 +21,17 @@
>  #include <linux/export.h>
>  #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
>  #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
> -#include <mach/cpu.h>
> -
> -#include "pm.h"
>  
>  #define AT91_MAX_STATES	2
>  
> +static void (*at91_standby)(void);
> +
>  /* Actual code that puts the SoC in different idle states */
>  static int at91_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  			struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>  			       int index)
>  {
> -	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
> -		at91rm9200_standby();
> -	else if (cpu_is_at91sam9g45())
> -		at91sam9g45_standby();
> -	else if (cpu_is_at91sam9263())
> -		at91sam9263_standby();
> -	else
> -		at91sam9_standby();
> -
> +	at91_standby();
>  	return index;
>  }
>  
> @@ -60,9 +51,19 @@ static struct cpuidle_driver at91_idle_driver = {
>  };
>  
>  /* Initialize CPU idle by registering the idle states */
> -static int __init at91_init_cpuidle(void)
> +static int __init at91_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>  {
> +	at91_standby = (void *)(dev->dev.platform_data);
> +	
>  	return cpuidle_register(&at91_idle_driver, NULL);
>  }
>  
> -device_initcall(at91_init_cpuidle);
> +static struct platform_driver at91_cpuidle_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "cpuidle-at91",
> +		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +	},
> +	.probe = at91_cpuidle_probe,
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(at91_cpuidle_driver);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> index 15afb5d..debdbf8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> @@ -314,6 +314,10 @@ static const struct platform_suspend_ops at91_pm_ops = {
>  	.end	= at91_pm_end,
>  };
>  
> +static struct platform_device at91_cpuidle_device = {
> +	.name = "cpuidle-at91",
> +};
> +
>  static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_AT91_SLOW_CLOCK
> @@ -323,8 +327,18 @@ static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
>  	pr_info("AT91: Power Management%s\n", (slow_clock ? " (with slow clock mode)" : ""));
>  
>  	/* AT91RM9200 SDRAM low-power mode cannot be used with self-refresh. */
> -	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
> +	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200()) {
> +		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91rm9200_standby;
>  		at91_ramc_write(0, AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_LPR, 0);
> +	} else if (cpu_is_at91sam9g45()) {
> +		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9g45_standby;
> +	} else if (cpu_is_at91sam9263()) {
> +		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9263_standby;
> +	} else {
> +		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9_standby;
no this is too dangerous when adding new SoC

you must list the supported SoC

and I prefer to move this code to the SoC init structure

so we can drop the if/else if/elsee

and drop the issue of adding new and the arch_initcall

Best Regards,
J.
> +	}
> +	
> +	platform_device_register(&at91_cpuidle_device);
>  
>  	suspend_set_ops(&at91_pm_ops);
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
>
Daniel Lezcano Oct. 14, 2013, 2:18 p.m. UTC | #2
On 10/14/2013 04:04 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 17:51 Sat 12 Oct     , Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Use the platform driver model to separate the cpuidle specific code from
>> the low level pm code. It allows to remove the dependency between
>> these two components.
>>
>> Tested-on usb-a9263 (at91sam9263)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c |   29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>>   arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c      |   16 +++++++++++++++-
>>   2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
>> index 4ec6a6d..6cdc76d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
>> @@ -21,26 +21,17 @@
>>   #include <linux/export.h>
>>   #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
>>   #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
>> -#include <mach/cpu.h>
>> -
>> -#include "pm.h"
>>
>>   #define AT91_MAX_STATES	2
>>
>> +static void (*at91_standby)(void);
>> +
>>   /* Actual code that puts the SoC in different idle states */
>>   static int at91_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>>   			struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>>   			       int index)
>>   {
>> -	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
>> -		at91rm9200_standby();
>> -	else if (cpu_is_at91sam9g45())
>> -		at91sam9g45_standby();
>> -	else if (cpu_is_at91sam9263())
>> -		at91sam9263_standby();
>> -	else
>> -		at91sam9_standby();
>> -
>> +	at91_standby();
>>   	return index;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -60,9 +51,19 @@ static struct cpuidle_driver at91_idle_driver = {
>>   };
>>
>>   /* Initialize CPU idle by registering the idle states */
>> -static int __init at91_init_cpuidle(void)
>> +static int __init at91_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>>   {
>> +	at91_standby = (void *)(dev->dev.platform_data);
>> +	
>>   	return cpuidle_register(&at91_idle_driver, NULL);
>>   }
>>
>> -device_initcall(at91_init_cpuidle);
>> +static struct platform_driver at91_cpuidle_driver = {
>> +	.driver = {
>> +		.name = "cpuidle-at91",
>> +		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> +	},
>> +	.probe = at91_cpuidle_probe,
>> +};
>> +
>> +module_platform_driver(at91_cpuidle_driver);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
>> index 15afb5d..debdbf8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
>> @@ -314,6 +314,10 @@ static const struct platform_suspend_ops at91_pm_ops = {
>>   	.end	= at91_pm_end,
>>   };
>>
>> +static struct platform_device at91_cpuidle_device = {
>> +	.name = "cpuidle-at91",
>> +};
>> +
>>   static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
>>   {
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_AT91_SLOW_CLOCK
>> @@ -323,8 +327,18 @@ static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
>>   	pr_info("AT91: Power Management%s\n", (slow_clock ? " (with slow clock mode)" : ""));
>>
>>   	/* AT91RM9200 SDRAM low-power mode cannot be used with self-refresh. */
>> -	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
>> +	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200()) {
>> +		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91rm9200_standby;
>>   		at91_ramc_write(0, AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_LPR, 0);
>> +	} else if (cpu_is_at91sam9g45()) {
>> +		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9g45_standby;
>> +	} else if (cpu_is_at91sam9263()) {
>> +		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9263_standby;
>> +	} else {
>> +		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9_standby;
> no this is too dangerous when adding new SoC
>
> you must list the supported SoC
>
> and I prefer to move this code to the SoC init structure

Do you mean register the platform_device in eg. at91rm9200_initialize 
with the right platform data ?


> so we can drop the if/else if/elsee
>
> and drop the issue of adding new and the arch_initcall
>
> Best Regards,
> J.
>> +	}
>> +	
>> +	platform_device_register(&at91_cpuidle_device);
>>
>>   	suspend_set_ops(&at91_pm_ops);
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Oct. 14, 2013, 2:27 p.m. UTC | #3
On 16:18 Mon 14 Oct     , Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 04:04 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >On 17:51 Sat 12 Oct     , Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>Use the platform driver model to separate the cpuidle specific code from
> >>the low level pm code. It allows to remove the dependency between
> >>these two components.
> >>
> >>Tested-on usb-a9263 (at91sam9263)
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> >>---
> >>  arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c |   29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> >>  arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c      |   16 +++++++++++++++-
> >>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
> >>index 4ec6a6d..6cdc76d 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
> >>@@ -21,26 +21,17 @@
> >>  #include <linux/export.h>
> >>  #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
> >>  #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
> >>-#include <mach/cpu.h>
> >>-
> >>-#include "pm.h"
> >>
> >>  #define AT91_MAX_STATES	2
> >>
> >>+static void (*at91_standby)(void);
> >>+
> >>  /* Actual code that puts the SoC in different idle states */
> >>  static int at91_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> >>  			struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> >>  			       int index)
> >>  {
> >>-	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
> >>-		at91rm9200_standby();
> >>-	else if (cpu_is_at91sam9g45())
> >>-		at91sam9g45_standby();
> >>-	else if (cpu_is_at91sam9263())
> >>-		at91sam9263_standby();
> >>-	else
> >>-		at91sam9_standby();
> >>-
> >>+	at91_standby();
> >>  	return index;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>@@ -60,9 +51,19 @@ static struct cpuidle_driver at91_idle_driver = {
> >>  };
> >>
> >>  /* Initialize CPU idle by registering the idle states */
> >>-static int __init at91_init_cpuidle(void)
> >>+static int __init at91_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> >>  {
> >>+	at91_standby = (void *)(dev->dev.platform_data);
> >>+	
> >>  	return cpuidle_register(&at91_idle_driver, NULL);
> >>  }
> >>
> >>-device_initcall(at91_init_cpuidle);
> >>+static struct platform_driver at91_cpuidle_driver = {
> >>+	.driver = {
> >>+		.name = "cpuidle-at91",
> >>+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >>+	},
> >>+	.probe = at91_cpuidle_probe,
> >>+};
> >>+
> >>+module_platform_driver(at91_cpuidle_driver);
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> >>index 15afb5d..debdbf8 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> >>@@ -314,6 +314,10 @@ static const struct platform_suspend_ops at91_pm_ops = {
> >>  	.end	= at91_pm_end,
> >>  };
> >>
> >>+static struct platform_device at91_cpuidle_device = {
> >>+	.name = "cpuidle-at91",
> >>+};
> >>+
> >>  static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
> >>  {
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_AT91_SLOW_CLOCK
> >>@@ -323,8 +327,18 @@ static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
> >>  	pr_info("AT91: Power Management%s\n", (slow_clock ? " (with slow clock mode)" : ""));
> >>
> >>  	/* AT91RM9200 SDRAM low-power mode cannot be used with self-refresh. */
> >>-	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
> >>+	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200()) {
> >>+		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91rm9200_standby;
> >>  		at91_ramc_write(0, AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_LPR, 0);
> >>+	} else if (cpu_is_at91sam9g45()) {
> >>+		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9g45_standby;
> >>+	} else if (cpu_is_at91sam9263()) {
> >>+		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9263_standby;
> >>+	} else {
> >>+		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9_standby;
> >no this is too dangerous when adding new SoC
> >
> >you must list the supported SoC
> >
> >and I prefer to move this code to the SoC init structure
> 
> Do you mean register the platform_device in eg.
> at91rm9200_initialize with the right platform data ?
> 
yes as example

Best Regards,
J.
> 
> >so we can drop the if/else if/elsee
> >
> >and drop the issue of adding new and the arch_initcall
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >J.
> >>+	}
> >>+	
> >>+	platform_device_register(&at91_cpuidle_device);
> >>
> >>  	suspend_set_ops(&at91_pm_ops);
> >>
> >>--
> >>1.7.9.5
> >>
> 
> 
> -- 
>  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
> 
> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
index 4ec6a6d..6cdc76d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
@@ -21,26 +21,17 @@ 
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
 #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
-#include <mach/cpu.h>
-
-#include "pm.h"
 
 #define AT91_MAX_STATES	2
 
+static void (*at91_standby)(void);
+
 /* Actual code that puts the SoC in different idle states */
 static int at91_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 			struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
 			       int index)
 {
-	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
-		at91rm9200_standby();
-	else if (cpu_is_at91sam9g45())
-		at91sam9g45_standby();
-	else if (cpu_is_at91sam9263())
-		at91sam9263_standby();
-	else
-		at91sam9_standby();
-
+	at91_standby();
 	return index;
 }
 
@@ -60,9 +51,19 @@  static struct cpuidle_driver at91_idle_driver = {
 };
 
 /* Initialize CPU idle by registering the idle states */
-static int __init at91_init_cpuidle(void)
+static int __init at91_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
 {
+	at91_standby = (void *)(dev->dev.platform_data);
+	
 	return cpuidle_register(&at91_idle_driver, NULL);
 }
 
-device_initcall(at91_init_cpuidle);
+static struct platform_driver at91_cpuidle_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "cpuidle-at91",
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	},
+	.probe = at91_cpuidle_probe,
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(at91_cpuidle_driver);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 15afb5d..debdbf8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
@@ -314,6 +314,10 @@  static const struct platform_suspend_ops at91_pm_ops = {
 	.end	= at91_pm_end,
 };
 
+static struct platform_device at91_cpuidle_device = {
+	.name = "cpuidle-at91",
+};
+
 static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_AT91_SLOW_CLOCK
@@ -323,8 +327,18 @@  static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
 	pr_info("AT91: Power Management%s\n", (slow_clock ? " (with slow clock mode)" : ""));
 
 	/* AT91RM9200 SDRAM low-power mode cannot be used with self-refresh. */
-	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
+	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200()) {
+		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91rm9200_standby;
 		at91_ramc_write(0, AT91RM9200_SDRAMC_LPR, 0);
+	} else if (cpu_is_at91sam9g45()) {
+		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9g45_standby;
+	} else if (cpu_is_at91sam9263()) {
+		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9263_standby;
+	} else {
+		at91_cpuidle_device.dev.platform_data = at91sam9_standby;
+	}
+	
+	platform_device_register(&at91_cpuidle_device);
 
 	suspend_set_ops(&at91_pm_ops);