Message ID | 1383954120-24368-15-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote: >Switch to memblock interfaces for early memory allocator instead of >bootmem allocator. No functional change in beahvior than what it is >in current code from bootmem users points of view. > >Archs already converted to NO_BOOTMEM now directly use memblock >interfaces instead of bootmem wrappers build on top of memblock. And >the >archs which still uses bootmem, these new apis just fallback to exiting >bootmem APIs. > >Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> >Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> >Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> > >Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> >--- > lib/swiotlb.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c >index 4e8686c..78ac01a 100644 >--- a/lib/swiotlb.c >+++ b/lib/swiotlb.c >@@ -169,8 +169,9 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, >unsigned long nslabs, int verbose) > /* > * Get the overflow emergency buffer > */ >- v_overflow_buffer = alloc_bootmem_low_pages_nopanic( >- PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow)); >+ v_overflow_buffer = memblock_virt_alloc_align_nopanic( >+ PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow), >+ PAGE_SIZE); Does this guarantee that the pages will be allocated below 4GB? > if (!v_overflow_buffer) > return -ENOMEM; > >@@ -181,11 +182,15 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, >unsigned long nslabs, int verbose) > * to find contiguous free memory regions of size up to IO_TLB_SEGSIZE > * between io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end. > */ >- io_tlb_list = alloc_bootmem_pages(PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * >sizeof(int))); >+ io_tlb_list = memblock_virt_alloc_align( >+ PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(int)), >+ PAGE_SIZE); > for (i = 0; i < io_tlb_nslabs; i++) > io_tlb_list[i] = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE); > io_tlb_index = 0; >- io_tlb_orig_addr = alloc_bootmem_pages(PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * >sizeof(phys_addr_t))); >+ io_tlb_orig_addr = memblock_virt_alloc_align( >+ PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t)), >+ PAGE_SIZE); > > if (verbose) > swiotlb_print_info(); >@@ -212,13 +217,14 @@ swiotlb_init(int verbose) > bytes = io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT; > > /* Get IO TLB memory from the low pages */ >- vstart = alloc_bootmem_low_pages_nopanic(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes)); >+ vstart = memblock_virt_alloc_align_nopanic(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes), >+ PAGE_SIZE); Ditto? > if (vstart && !swiotlb_init_with_tbl(vstart, io_tlb_nslabs, verbose)) > return; > > if (io_tlb_start) >- free_bootmem(io_tlb_start, >- PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); >+ memblock_free_early(io_tlb_start, >+ PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); > pr_warn("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer"); > no_iotlb_memory = true; > } >@@ -354,14 +360,14 @@ void __init swiotlb_free(void) > free_pages((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start), > get_order(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); > } else { >- free_bootmem_late(io_tlb_overflow_buffer, >- PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow)); >- free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_orig_addr), >- PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t))); >- free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_list), >- PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(int))); >- free_bootmem_late(io_tlb_start, >- PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); >+ memblock_free_late(io_tlb_overflow_buffer, >+ PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow)); >+ memblock_free_late(__pa(io_tlb_orig_addr), >+ PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t))); >+ memblock_free_late(__pa(io_tlb_list), >+ PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(int))); >+ memblock_free_late(io_tlb_start, >+ PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); > } > io_tlb_nslabs = 0; > }
On Saturday 09 November 2013 11:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote: >> Switch to memblock interfaces for early memory allocator instead of >> bootmem allocator. No functional change in beahvior than what it is >> in current code from bootmem users points of view. >> >> Archs already converted to NO_BOOTMEM now directly use memblock >> interfaces instead of bootmem wrappers build on top of memblock. And >> the >> archs which still uses bootmem, these new apis just fallback to exiting >> bootmem APIs. >> >> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> >> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> >> --- >> lib/swiotlb.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c >> index 4e8686c..78ac01a 100644 >> --- a/lib/swiotlb.c >> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c >> @@ -169,8 +169,9 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, >> unsigned long nslabs, int verbose) >> /* >> * Get the overflow emergency buffer >> */ >> - v_overflow_buffer = alloc_bootmem_low_pages_nopanic( >> - PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow)); >> + v_overflow_buffer = memblock_virt_alloc_align_nopanic( >> + PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow), >> + PAGE_SIZE); > > Does this guarantee that the pages will be allocated below 4GB? > Yes. The memblock layer still allocates memory from lowmem. As I mentioned, there is no change in the behavior than what is today apart from just the interface change. Regards, Santosh
diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c index 4e8686c..78ac01a 100644 --- a/lib/swiotlb.c +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c @@ -169,8 +169,9 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose) /* * Get the overflow emergency buffer */ - v_overflow_buffer = alloc_bootmem_low_pages_nopanic( - PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow)); + v_overflow_buffer = memblock_virt_alloc_align_nopanic( + PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow), + PAGE_SIZE); if (!v_overflow_buffer) return -ENOMEM; @@ -181,11 +182,15 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose) * to find contiguous free memory regions of size up to IO_TLB_SEGSIZE * between io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end. */ - io_tlb_list = alloc_bootmem_pages(PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(int))); + io_tlb_list = memblock_virt_alloc_align( + PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(int)), + PAGE_SIZE); for (i = 0; i < io_tlb_nslabs; i++) io_tlb_list[i] = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE); io_tlb_index = 0; - io_tlb_orig_addr = alloc_bootmem_pages(PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t))); + io_tlb_orig_addr = memblock_virt_alloc_align( + PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t)), + PAGE_SIZE); if (verbose) swiotlb_print_info(); @@ -212,13 +217,14 @@ swiotlb_init(int verbose) bytes = io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT; /* Get IO TLB memory from the low pages */ - vstart = alloc_bootmem_low_pages_nopanic(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes)); + vstart = memblock_virt_alloc_align_nopanic(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes), + PAGE_SIZE); if (vstart && !swiotlb_init_with_tbl(vstart, io_tlb_nslabs, verbose)) return; if (io_tlb_start) - free_bootmem(io_tlb_start, - PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); + memblock_free_early(io_tlb_start, + PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); pr_warn("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer"); no_iotlb_memory = true; } @@ -354,14 +360,14 @@ void __init swiotlb_free(void) free_pages((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start), get_order(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); } else { - free_bootmem_late(io_tlb_overflow_buffer, - PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow)); - free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_orig_addr), - PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t))); - free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_list), - PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(int))); - free_bootmem_late(io_tlb_start, - PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); + memblock_free_late(io_tlb_overflow_buffer, + PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_overflow)); + memblock_free_late(__pa(io_tlb_orig_addr), + PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t))); + memblock_free_late(__pa(io_tlb_list), + PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(int))); + memblock_free_late(io_tlb_start, + PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); } io_tlb_nslabs = 0; }
Switch to memblock interfaces for early memory allocator instead of bootmem allocator. No functional change in beahvior than what it is in current code from bootmem users points of view. Archs already converted to NO_BOOTMEM now directly use memblock interfaces instead of bootmem wrappers build on top of memblock. And the archs which still uses bootmem, these new apis just fallback to exiting bootmem APIs. Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> --- lib/swiotlb.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)