diff mbox

[v3,06/23] mm/memblock: reorder parameters of memblock_find_in_range_node

Message ID 1386625856-12942-7-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Santosh Shilimkar Dec. 9, 2013, 9:50 p.m. UTC
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>

Reorder parameters of memblock_find_in_range_node to be consistent
with other memblock APIs.

The change was suggested by Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>.

Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
---
 include/linux/memblock.h |    5 +++--
 mm/memblock.c            |   16 ++++++++--------
 mm/nobootmem.c           |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Tejun Heo Dec. 13, 2013, 9:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:50:39PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
> 
> Reorder parameters of memblock_find_in_range_node to be consistent
> with other memblock APIs.
> 
> The change was suggested by Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>.
> 
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Thanks.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 77c60e5..dca4533 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -47,8 +47,9 @@  extern int memblock_debug;
 #define memblock_dbg(fmt, ...) \
 	if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
 
-phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
-				phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
+phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
+					    phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
+					    int nid);
 phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
 				   phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align);
 phys_addr_t get_allocated_memblock_reserved_regions_info(phys_addr_t *addr);
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 784958d..8786503 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -154,10 +154,10 @@  __memblock_find_range_top_down(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
 
 /**
  * memblock_find_in_range_node - find free area in given range and node
- * @start: start of candidate range
- * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
  * @size: size of free area to find
  * @align: alignment of free area to find
+ * @start: start of candidate range
+ * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
  * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node
  *
  * Find @size free area aligned to @align in the specified range and node.
@@ -173,9 +173,9 @@  __memblock_find_range_top_down(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
  * RETURNS:
  * Found address on success, 0 on failure.
  */
-phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
-					phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size,
-					phys_addr_t align, int nid)
+phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size,
+					phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start,
+					phys_addr_t end, int nid)
 {
 	int ret;
 	phys_addr_t kernel_end;
@@ -238,8 +238,8 @@  phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start,
 					phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size,
 					phys_addr_t align)
 {
-	return memblock_find_in_range_node(start, end, size, align,
-					   MAX_NUMNODES);
+	return memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, start, end,
+					    MAX_NUMNODES);
 }
 
 static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, unsigned long r)
@@ -889,7 +889,7 @@  static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size,
 	/* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */
 	size = round_up(size, align);
 
-	found = memblock_find_in_range_node(0, max_addr, size, align, nid);
+	found = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, 0, max_addr, nid);
 	if (found && !memblock_reserve(found, size))
 		return found;
 
diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c
index 2c254d3..59777e0 100644
--- a/mm/nobootmem.c
+++ b/mm/nobootmem.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@  static void * __init __alloc_memory_core_early(int nid, u64 size, u64 align,
 	if (limit > memblock.current_limit)
 		limit = memblock.current_limit;
 
-	addr = memblock_find_in_range_node(goal, limit, size, align, nid);
+	addr = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, goal, limit, nid);
 	if (!addr)
 		return NULL;