From patchwork Mon Dec 9 21:50:39 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Santosh Shilimkar X-Patchwork-Id: 3313431 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3667CC0D4A for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 22:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85709202E5 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 22:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [85.118.1.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13BAF2016D for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 22:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([2001:4978:20e::2]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Vq8mp-0004s0-Jy; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:54:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Vq8m3-0003hK-Hc; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:53:55 +0000 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Vq8kV-0003Li-GG for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:52:27 +0000 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id rB9LpslS009914; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:51:54 -0600 Received: from DLEE71.ent.ti.com (dlee71.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.114]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB9LpsrU019214; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:51:54 -0600 Received: from dflp33.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.16) by DLEE71.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:51:54 -0600 Received: from ula0393909.am.dhcp.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB9LpQfP004752; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:51:53 -0600 From: Santosh Shilimkar To: Subject: [PATCH v3 06/23] mm/memblock: reorder parameters of memblock_find_in_range_node Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:50:39 -0500 Message-ID: <1386625856-12942-7-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1386625856-12942-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> References: <1386625856-12942-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20131209_165219_988228_A0CD72C1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.44 ) X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Cc: Grygorii Strashko , linux-mm@kvack.org, Santosh Shilimkar , Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , Yinghai Lu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Grygorii Strashko Reorder parameters of memblock_find_in_range_node to be consistent with other memblock APIs. The change was suggested by Tejun Heo . Cc: Yinghai Lu Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo --- include/linux/memblock.h | 5 +++-- mm/memblock.c | 16 ++++++++-------- mm/nobootmem.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index 77c60e5..dca4533 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -47,8 +47,9 @@ extern int memblock_debug; #define memblock_dbg(fmt, ...) \ if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) -phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, - phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid); +phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, + phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, + int nid); phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align); phys_addr_t get_allocated_memblock_reserved_regions_info(phys_addr_t *addr); diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 784958d..8786503 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -154,10 +154,10 @@ __memblock_find_range_top_down(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, /** * memblock_find_in_range_node - find free area in given range and node - * @start: start of candidate range - * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE} * @size: size of free area to find * @align: alignment of free area to find + * @start: start of candidate range + * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE} * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node * * Find @size free area aligned to @align in the specified range and node. @@ -173,9 +173,9 @@ __memblock_find_range_top_down(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, * RETURNS: * Found address on success, 0 on failure. */ -phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start, - phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size, - phys_addr_t align, int nid) +phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size, + phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start, + phys_addr_t end, int nid) { int ret; phys_addr_t kernel_end; @@ -238,8 +238,8 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align) { - return memblock_find_in_range_node(start, end, size, align, - MAX_NUMNODES); + return memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, start, end, + MAX_NUMNODES); } static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, unsigned long r) @@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size, /* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */ size = round_up(size, align); - found = memblock_find_in_range_node(0, max_addr, size, align, nid); + found = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, 0, max_addr, nid); if (found && !memblock_reserve(found, size)) return found; diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c index 2c254d3..59777e0 100644 --- a/mm/nobootmem.c +++ b/mm/nobootmem.c @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void * __init __alloc_memory_core_early(int nid, u64 size, u64 align, if (limit > memblock.current_limit) limit = memblock.current_limit; - addr = memblock_find_in_range_node(goal, limit, size, align, nid); + addr = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, goal, limit, nid); if (!addr) return NULL;