diff mbox

[2/5] i2c: mv64xxx: refactor message start to ensure proper initialization

Message ID 1392323793-4125-3-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Wolfram Sang Feb. 13, 2014, 8:36 p.m. UTC
Because the offload mechanism can fall back to a standard transfer,
having two seperate initialization states is unfortunate. Let's just
have one state which does things consistently. This fixes a bug where
some preparation was missing when the fallback happened. And it makes
the code much easier to follow.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Gregory CLEMENT Feb. 14, 2014, 11:39 a.m. UTC | #1
On 13/02/2014 21:36, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Because the offload mechanism can fall back to a standard transfer,
> having two seperate initialization states is unfortunate. Let's just
> have one state which does things consistently. This fixes a bug where
> some preparation was missing when the fallback happened. And it makes
> the code much easier to follow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>


Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

With this one the bug we observed was fixed.


Thanks,

Gregory


> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> index ba64978..d52d849 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ enum {
>  enum {
>  	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_INVALID,
>  	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_CONTINUE,
> -	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START,
>  	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START,
>  	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_RESTART,
>  	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_RESTART,
> @@ -460,15 +459,14 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)
>  			drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
>  		break;
>  
> -	case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START:
> -		if (!mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data))
> -			break;
> -		else
> -			drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
> -		/* FALLTHRU */
>  	case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START:
> -		writel(drv_data->cntl_bits | MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START,
> -			drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
> +		/* Can we offload this msg ? */
> +		if (mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data) < 0) {
> +			/* No, switch to standard path */
> +			mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, drv_data->msgs);
> +			writel(drv_data->cntl_bits | MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START,
> +				drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
> +		}
>  		break;
>  
>  	case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_ADDR_1:
> @@ -627,15 +625,10 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_execute_msg(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, struct i2c_msg *msg,
>  	unsigned long	flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&drv_data->lock, flags);
> -	if (drv_data->offload_enabled) {
> -		drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START;
> -		drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
> -	} else {
> -		mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, msg);
>  
> -		drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
> -		drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
> -	}
> +	drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
> +	drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
> +
>  	drv_data->send_stop = is_last;
>  	drv_data->block = 1;
>  	mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(drv_data);
>
Wolfram Sang Feb. 15, 2014, 2:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:39:02PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 13/02/2014 21:36, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Because the offload mechanism can fall back to a standard transfer,
> > having two seperate initialization states is unfortunate. Let's just
> > have one state which does things consistently. This fixes a bug where
> > some preparation was missing when the fallback happened. And it makes
> > the code much easier to follow.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> 
> 
> Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> 
> With this one the bug we observed was fixed.

I squashed patches 1+2 (easier handling for stable) and applied to
for-current, thanks!
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
index ba64978..d52d849 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
@@ -97,7 +97,6 @@  enum {
 enum {
 	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_INVALID,
 	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_CONTINUE,
-	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START,
 	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START,
 	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_RESTART,
 	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_RESTART,
@@ -460,15 +459,14 @@  mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)
 			drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
 		break;
 
-	case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START:
-		if (!mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data))
-			break;
-		else
-			drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
-		/* FALLTHRU */
 	case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START:
-		writel(drv_data->cntl_bits | MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START,
-			drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
+		/* Can we offload this msg ? */
+		if (mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data) < 0) {
+			/* No, switch to standard path */
+			mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, drv_data->msgs);
+			writel(drv_data->cntl_bits | MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START,
+				drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
+		}
 		break;
 
 	case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_ADDR_1:
@@ -627,15 +625,10 @@  mv64xxx_i2c_execute_msg(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, struct i2c_msg *msg,
 	unsigned long	flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&drv_data->lock, flags);
-	if (drv_data->offload_enabled) {
-		drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START;
-		drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
-	} else {
-		mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, msg);
 
-		drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
-		drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
-	}
+	drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
+	drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
+
 	drv_data->send_stop = is_last;
 	drv_data->block = 1;
 	mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(drv_data);