| Message ID | 1392451533-12858-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Saturday 15 February 2014, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
The patches all look good to me. Please let us know whether we should apply
them directly of if you were just looking for a review. (it helps to put
that into the [PATCH 0/4] message).
Arnd
Hello. On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:11:41 +0100 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Saturday 15 February 2014, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> > > The patches all look good to me. Please let us know whether we should apply > them directly of if you were just looking for a review. (it helps to put > that into the [PATCH 0/4] message). Before that, I tried to send an accompanying message to the arm@kernel.org, but unfortunately my email is blocked for sending to this address. While I expect to applying some other patches for this architecture, I do a minor changes that do not have potential conflicts when applying one to the other. Yes, please apply them, if it possible. Thanks.
On Tuesday 18 February 2014, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > Before that, I tried to send an accompanying message to the arm@kernel.org, > but unfortunately my email is blocked for sending to this address. > > While I expect to applying some other patches for this architecture, I do a > minor changes that do not have potential conflicts when applying one to > the other. Yes, please apply them, if it possible. > I've applied patches 2 and 3 in the next/cleanup branch now, and patches 1 and 4 as fixes-non-crictical. I believe that is all you have sent at the moment, let me know if I have missed other patches from you. Also make sure to always use the arm@kernel.org alias when you actually want us to apply your patches, that way we can keep track of it more easily. Arnd
???????, 28 ??????? 2014, 17:53 +01:00 ?? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: > On Tuesday 18 February 2014, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > Before that, I tried to send an accompanying message to the arm@kernel.org, > > but unfortunately my email is blocked for sending to this address. > > > > While I expect to applying some other patches for this architecture, I do a > > minor changes that do not have potential conflicts when applying one to > > the other. Yes, please apply them, if it possible. > > > > I've applied patches 2 and 3 in the next/cleanup branch now, and patches 1 and > 4 as fixes-non-crictical. > > I believe that is all you have sent at the moment, let me know if I have > missed other patches from you. Also make sure to always use the arm@kernel.org > alias when you actually want us to apply your patches, that way we can keep > track of it more easily. No, it's all that was planned through arm-soc at this time. Thanks. ---
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-clps711x/board-autcpu12.c b/arch/arm/mach-clps711x/board-autcpu12.c index f8d71a8..5f83113 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-clps711x/board-autcpu12.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-clps711x/board-autcpu12.c @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ #define AUTCPU12_SMC_NCE (AUTCPU12_MMGPIO_BASE + 0) /* Bit 0 */ #define AUTCPU12_SMC_RDY CLPS711X_GPIO(1, 2) #define AUTCPU12_SMC_ALE CLPS711X_GPIO(1, 3) -#define AUTCPU12_SMC_CLE CLPS711X_GPIO(1, 3) +#define AUTCPU12_SMC_CLE CLPS711X_GPIO(1, 4) /* LCD contrast digital potentiometer */ #define AUTCPU12_DPOT_CS CLPS711X_GPIO(4, 0)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> --- arch/arm/mach-clps711x/board-autcpu12.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)