| Message ID | 1396813085-15363-1-git-send-email-gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:38:05PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Booting Linux 3.14 on Pandaboard currently gets the following > message displayed: > > smp_twd: clock not found -2 > > Whereas an "smp_twd" clock exists for omap4. The following change > avoids this. NAK. The TWD has required this clock for 15 months, and all OMAP has to do is to supply the clock in its DT description. Why is OMAP not supplying this clock?
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c index 6591e26..67754af 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void twd_get_clock(struct device_node *np) if (np) twd_clk = of_clk_get(np, 0); - else + if (np == NULL || IS_ERR(twd_clk)) twd_clk = clk_get_sys("smp_twd", NULL); if (IS_ERR(twd_clk)) {
Booting Linux 3.14 on Pandaboard currently gets the following message displayed: smp_twd: clock not found -2 Whereas an "smp_twd" clock exists for omap4. The following change avoids this. Signed-off-by: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> --- arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)