diff mbox

[PATCHv5] ARM: EXYNOS: Support secondary CPU boot of Exynos4212

Message ID 1398735462-1938-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Chanwoo Choi April 29, 2014, 1:37 a.m. UTC
From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

This patch fix the offset of CPU boot address and change parameter of smc call
of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command for Exynos4212.

Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
---
Changes from v4:
- Post only this patch separated from following patchset[1]
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/24/873

 arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Chanwoo Choi May 7, 2014, 4:37 a.m. UTC | #1
Dear Kukjin,

Could you please pick this patch?

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi

On 04/29/2014 10:37 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> 
> This patch fix the offset of CPU boot address and change parameter of smc call
> of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command for Exynos4212.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes from v4:
> - Post only this patch separated from following patchset[1]
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/24/873
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> index 932129e..aa01c42 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>  
>  #include <mach/map.h>
>  
> +#include <plat/cpu.h>
> +
>  #include "smc.h"
>  
>  static int exynos_do_idle(void)
> @@ -28,13 +30,24 @@ static int exynos_do_idle(void)
>  
>  static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * The second parameter of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command means CPU id.
> +	 * But, Exynos4212 has only one secondary CPU so second parameter
> +	 * isn't used for informing secure firmware about CPU id.
> +	 */
> +	if (soc_is_exynos4212())
> +		cpu = 0;
> +
>  	exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr)
>  {
> -	void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c + 4*cpu;
> +	void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c;
> +
> +	if (!soc_is_exynos4212())
> +		boot_reg += 4*cpu;
>  
>  	__raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg);
>  	return 0;
>
Kim Kukjin May 9, 2014, 2:14 a.m. UTC | #2
Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> 
> Dear Kukjin,
> 
> Could you please pick this patch?
> 
I've applied.

Thanks,
Kukjin

> Best Regards,
> Chanwoo Choi
> 
> On 04/29/2014 10:37 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> >
> > This patch fix the offset of CPU boot address and change parameter of
> smc call
> > of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command for Exynos4212.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > Changes from v4:
> > - Post only this patch separated from following patchset[1]
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/24/873
> >
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> exynos/firmware.c
> > index 932129e..aa01c42 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
> >
> >  #include <mach/map.h>
> >
> > +#include <plat/cpu.h>
> > +
> >  #include "smc.h"
> >
> >  static int exynos_do_idle(void)
> > @@ -28,13 +30,24 @@ static int exynos_do_idle(void)
> >
> >  static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu)
> >  {
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The second parameter of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command means CPU id.
> > +	 * But, Exynos4212 has only one secondary CPU so second parameter
> > +	 * isn't used for informing secure firmware about CPU id.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (soc_is_exynos4212())
> > +		cpu = 0;
> > +
> >  	exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr)
> >  {
> > -	void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c + 4*cpu;
> > +	void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c;
> > +
> > +	if (!soc_is_exynos4212())
> > +		boot_reg += 4*cpu;
> >
> >  	__raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg);
> >  	return 0;
> >
Chanwoo Choi May 9, 2014, 2:20 a.m. UTC | #3
On 05/09/2014 11:14 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>
>> Dear Kukjin,
>>
>> Could you please pick this patch?
>>
> I've applied.

Thanks for your apply.

Best regards,
Chanwoo Choi
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
index 932129e..aa01c42 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ 
 
 #include <mach/map.h>
 
+#include <plat/cpu.h>
+
 #include "smc.h"
 
 static int exynos_do_idle(void)
@@ -28,13 +30,24 @@  static int exynos_do_idle(void)
 
 static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu)
 {
+	/*
+	 * The second parameter of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command means CPU id.
+	 * But, Exynos4212 has only one secondary CPU so second parameter
+	 * isn't used for informing secure firmware about CPU id.
+	 */
+	if (soc_is_exynos4212())
+		cpu = 0;
+
 	exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0);
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr)
 {
-	void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c + 4*cpu;
+	void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c;
+
+	if (!soc_is_exynos4212())
+		boot_reg += 4*cpu;
 
 	__raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg);
 	return 0;