diff mbox

[04/22] clk: sunxi: move "ahb_sdram" to protected clock list

Message ID 1400831485-28576-5-git-send-email-wens@csie.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Chen-Yu Tsai May 23, 2014, 7:51 a.m. UTC
With sunxi_gates clocks registered with clkdev, we can use the
protected clocks list to enable the "ahb_sdram" clock, instead
of looking for it and adding CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED inline in the
clock setup code.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
---
 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Maxime Ripard May 25, 2014, 6:51 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:51:07PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> With sunxi_gates clocks registered with clkdev, we can use the
> protected clocks list to enable the "ahb_sdram" clock, instead
> of looking for it and adding CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED inline in the
> clock setup code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> index 3e33bc1..b2c6d12 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> @@ -870,7 +870,6 @@ static void __init sunxi_gates_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
>  	int qty;
>  	int i = 0;
>  	int j = 0;
> -	int ignore;
>  
>  	reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
>  
> @@ -891,15 +890,12 @@ static void __init sunxi_gates_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
>  		of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
>  					      j, &clk_name);
>  
> -		/* No driver claims this clock, but it should remain gated */
> -		ignore = !strcmp("ahb_sdram", clk_name) ? CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED : 0;
> -
>  		clk_data->clks[i] = clk_register_gate(NULL, clk_name,
> -						      clk_parent, ignore,
> +						      clk_parent, 0,
>  						      reg + 4 * (i/32), i % 32,
>  						      0, &clk_lock);
>  		WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk_data->clks[i]));
> -		clk_register_clkdev(clks[i], clk_name, NULL);
> +		clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[i], clk_name, NULL);

I'm fine with the change itself, but shouldn't this part of it be in
the patch that actually add this line?

Looks broken to me otherwise.

Maxime
Chen-Yu Tsai May 26, 2014, 9:43 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:51:07PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> With sunxi_gates clocks registered with clkdev, we can use the
>> protected clocks list to enable the "ahb_sdram" clock, instead
>> of looking for it and adding CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED inline in the
>> clock setup code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 10 ++++------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
>> index 3e33bc1..b2c6d12 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
>> @@ -870,7 +870,6 @@ static void __init sunxi_gates_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
>>       int qty;
>>       int i = 0;
>>       int j = 0;
>> -     int ignore;
>>
>>       reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
>>
>> @@ -891,15 +890,12 @@ static void __init sunxi_gates_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
>>               of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
>>                                             j, &clk_name);
>>
>> -             /* No driver claims this clock, but it should remain gated */
>> -             ignore = !strcmp("ahb_sdram", clk_name) ? CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED : 0;
>> -
>>               clk_data->clks[i] = clk_register_gate(NULL, clk_name,
>> -                                                   clk_parent, ignore,
>> +                                                   clk_parent, 0,
>>                                                     reg + 4 * (i/32), i % 32,
>>                                                     0, &clk_lock);
>>               WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk_data->clks[i]));
>> -             clk_register_clkdev(clks[i], clk_name, NULL);
>> +             clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[i], clk_name, NULL);
>
> I'm fine with the change itself, but shouldn't this part of it be in
> the patch that actually add this line?
>
> Looks broken to me otherwise.

Brain fart on my part. I squashed a fixup for patch 2 into this one.


Thanks
ChenYu
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
index 3e33bc1..b2c6d12 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
@@ -870,7 +870,6 @@  static void __init sunxi_gates_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 	int qty;
 	int i = 0;
 	int j = 0;
-	int ignore;
 
 	reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
 
@@ -891,15 +890,12 @@  static void __init sunxi_gates_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 		of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
 					      j, &clk_name);
 
-		/* No driver claims this clock, but it should remain gated */
-		ignore = !strcmp("ahb_sdram", clk_name) ? CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED : 0;
-
 		clk_data->clks[i] = clk_register_gate(NULL, clk_name,
-						      clk_parent, ignore,
+						      clk_parent, 0,
 						      reg + 4 * (i/32), i % 32,
 						      0, &clk_lock);
 		WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk_data->clks[i]));
-		clk_register_clkdev(clks[i], clk_name, NULL);
+		clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[i], clk_name, NULL);
 
 		j++;
 	}
@@ -1204,6 +1200,7 @@  static void __init sunxi_init_clocks(const char *clocks[], int nclocks)
 
 static const char *sun4i_a10_critical_clocks[] __initdata = {
 	"pll5_ddr",
+	"ahb_sdram",
 };
 
 static void __init sun4i_a10_init_clocks(void)
@@ -1216,6 +1213,7 @@  CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun4i_a10_clk_init, "allwinner,sun4i-a10", sun4i_a10_init_clocks)
 static const char *sun5i_critical_clocks[] __initdata = {
 	"mbus",
 	"pll5_ddr",
+	"ahb_sdram",
 };
 
 static void __init sun5i_init_clocks(void)