| Message ID | 1409560568-6911-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Il 01/09/2014 10:36, Eric Auger ha scritto: > No more needed. irq.h would be void on ARM. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > > --- > > I don't think irq.h is needed anymore since Paul Mackerras' work. However > I did not compile for all architectures. > --- > virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > index 3c5981c..0c712a7 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ > #include <linux/seqlock.h> > #include <trace/events/kvm.h> > > -#include "irq.h" > #include "iodev.h" > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD > Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Christoffer, please include this via the ARM tree, together with ARM irqfd support. Thanks, Paolo
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 12:11:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 01/09/2014 10:36, Eric Auger ha scritto: > > No more needed. irq.h would be void on ARM. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > > > > --- > > > > I don't think irq.h is needed anymore since Paul Mackerras' work. However > > I did not compile for all architectures. > > --- > > virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > > index 3c5981c..0c712a7 100644 > > --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > > +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > > @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ > > #include <linux/seqlock.h> > > #include <trace/events/kvm.h> > > > > -#include "irq.h" > > #include "iodev.h" > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD > > > > Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > > Christoffer, please include this via the ARM tree, together with ARM > irqfd support. Thanks, > Marc is dealing with the tree this week and the next so he can apply it to kvmarm/queue. Do you want it to wait and go with the irqfd patch (which has dependencies not yet resolved) or should we just queue it? Thanks, -Christoffer
Il 11/09/2014 05:09, Christoffer Dall ha scritto: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 12:11:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 01/09/2014 10:36, Eric Auger ha scritto: >>> No more needed. irq.h would be void on ARM. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >>> >>> --- >>> >>> I don't think irq.h is needed anymore since Paul Mackerras' work. However >>> I did not compile for all architectures. >>> --- >>> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 1 - >>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >>> index 3c5981c..0c712a7 100644 >>> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >>> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >>> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ >>> #include <linux/seqlock.h> >>> #include <trace/events/kvm.h> >>> >>> -#include "irq.h" >>> #include "iodev.h" >>> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD >>> >> >> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> >> Christoffer, please include this via the ARM tree, together with ARM >> irqfd support. Thanks, >> > Marc is dealing with the tree this week and the next so he can apply it > to kvmarm/queue. Do you want it to wait and go with the irqfd patch > (which has dependencies not yet resolved) or should we just queue it? As you prefer. Paolo
On 11/09/14 08:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 11/09/2014 05:09, Christoffer Dall ha scritto: >> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 12:11:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> Il 01/09/2014 10:36, Eric Auger ha scritto: >>>> No more needed. irq.h would be void on ARM. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> I don't think irq.h is needed anymore since Paul Mackerras' work. However >>>> I did not compile for all architectures. >>>> --- >>>> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 1 - >>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >>>> index 3c5981c..0c712a7 100644 >>>> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >>>> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ >>>> #include <linux/seqlock.h> >>>> #include <trace/events/kvm.h> >>>> >>>> -#include "irq.h" >>>> #include "iodev.h" >>>> >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD >>>> >>> >>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> >>> >>> Christoffer, please include this via the ARM tree, together with ARM >>> irqfd support. Thanks, >>> >> Marc is dealing with the tree this week and the next so he can apply it >> to kvmarm/queue. Do you want it to wait and go with the irqfd patch >> (which has dependencies not yet resolved) or should we just queue it? > > As you prefer. Added to kvmarm/queue. Thanks, M.
diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c index 3c5981c..0c712a7 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ #include <linux/seqlock.h> #include <trace/events/kvm.h> -#include "irq.h" #include "iodev.h" #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
No more needed. irq.h would be void on ARM. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> --- I don't think irq.h is needed anymore since Paul Mackerras' work. However I did not compile for all architectures. --- virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)