From patchwork Tue Sep 2 10:35:24 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sudeep Holla X-Patchwork-Id: 4824221 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A0CC0338 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1538C20155 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:40:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 211DE200F0 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XOlQi-0004pc-41; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:35:16 +0000 Received: from fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.21] helo=cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XOlQf-0003gM-GJ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:35:14 +0000 Received: from e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.207.61]) by cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s82AYjHV016851; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:34:45 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] arm64: use irq_set_affinity with force=false when migrating irqs Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:35:24 +0100 Message-Id: <1409654124-7358-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.2 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20140902_033513_897921_7A165B93 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.46 ) X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Cc: Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , stable@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Sudeep Holla The arm64 interrupt migration code on cpu offline calls irqchip.irq_set_affinity() with the argument force=true. Originally this argument had no effect because it was not used by any interrupt chip driver and there was no semantics defined. This changed with commit 01f8fa4f01d8 ("genirq: Allow forcing cpu affinity of interrupts") which made the force argument useful to route interrupts to not yet online cpus without checking the target cpu against the cpu online mask. The following commit ffde1de64012 ("irqchip: gic: Support forced affinity setting") implemented this for the GIC interrupt controller. As a consequence the cpu offline irq migration fails if CPU0 is offlined, because CPU0 is still set in the affinity mask and the validation against cpu online mask is skipped to the force argument being true. The following first_cpu(mask) selection always selects CPU0 as the target. Commit 601c942176d8("arm64: use cpu_online_mask when using forced irq_set_affinity") intended to fix the above mentioned issue but introduced another issue where affinity can be migrated to a wrong CPU due to unconditional copy of cpu_online_mask. As with for arm, solve the issue by calling irq_set_affinity() with force=false from the CPU offline irq migration code so the GIC driver validates the affinity mask against CPU online mask and therefore removes CPU0 from the possible target candidates. Also revert the changes done in the commit 601c942176d8 as it's no longer needed. Tested on Juno platform. Fixes: 601c942176d8("arm64: use cpu_online_mask when using forced irq_set_affinity") Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla Acked-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: # 3.10.x --- arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Hi Will, After both Russell and Thomas agreed on the fix for ARM[0][1], I have similar fix for ARM64 with change log giving background as suggested by Thomas. It would be good if you can take this for next -rc fix. Regards, Sudeep [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg358336.html [1] http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8133/1 diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c index 0f08dfd69ebc..dfa6e3e74fdd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c @@ -97,19 +97,15 @@ static bool migrate_one_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) if (irqd_is_per_cpu(d) || !cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), affinity)) return false; - if (cpumask_any_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) + if (cpumask_any_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) { + affinity = cpu_online_mask; ret = true; + } - /* - * when using forced irq_set_affinity we must ensure that the cpu - * being offlined is not present in the affinity mask, it may be - * selected as the target CPU otherwise - */ - affinity = cpu_online_mask; c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d); if (!c->irq_set_affinity) pr_debug("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq); - else if (c->irq_set_affinity(d, affinity, true) == IRQ_SET_MASK_OK && ret) + else if (c->irq_set_affinity(d, affinity, false) == IRQ_SET_MASK_OK && ret) cpumask_copy(d->affinity, affinity); return ret;