| Message ID | 1413875672-7894-2-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig index 5918d40..1b32023 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig @@ -849,6 +849,8 @@ config ARCH_VIRT # source "arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig" +source "arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig" + source "arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig" source "arch/arm/mach-axxia/Kconfig" diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig new file mode 100644 index 0000000..eef90d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +config MACH_ASM9260 + bool "Alphascale ASM9260" + depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5 + select IRQ_MXS + select ASM9260_TIMER + select CPU_ARM926T + help + Support for Alpascale ASM9260 based platform.
it is low cost (?) SoC targeted for market in China and India which trying to compete with AT91SAM9G25. Here is some info: http://www.alphascale.com/index.asp?ics/615.html One of products: http://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/2014-hot-sales-FREE-SHIPPING-new-Purple-core-ARM9-development-board-ASM9260T-SDRAM-power-line/433637_1931495721.html In some cases this SoC looks similar to iMX23/iMX28. But currently it makes no sense to merge mach code of this devices. Especially because most differences are already collected mach-mxs folder. Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> --- arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 ++ arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig