@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap2xxx_clks[] = {
DT_CLK(NULL, "gfx_3d_fck", "gfx_3d_fck"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "gfx_2d_fck", "gfx_2d_fck"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "gfx_ick", "gfx_ick"),
- DT_CLK("omapdss_dss", "ick", "dss_ick"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "dss_ick", "dss_ick"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "dss1_fck", "dss1_fck"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "dss2_fck", "dss2_fck"),
@@ -265,7 +265,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap3430es1_clks[] = {
DT_CLK(NULL, "ssi_ick", "ssi_ick_3430es1"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "usb_l4_ick", "usb_l4_ick"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "dss1_alwon_fck", "dss1_alwon_fck_3430es1"),
- DT_CLK("omapdss_dss", "ick", "dss_ick_3430es1"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "dss_ick", "dss_ick_3430es1"),
{ .node_name = NULL },
};
@@ -284,7 +283,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap36xx_am35xx_omap3430es2plus_clks[] = {
DT_CLK(NULL, "mmchs3_ick", "mmchs3_ick"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "mmchs3_fck", "mmchs3_fck"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "dss1_alwon_fck", "dss1_alwon_fck_3430es2"),
- DT_CLK("omapdss_dss", "ick", "dss_ick_3430es2"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "dss_ick", "dss_ick_3430es2"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "usbhost_120m_fck", "usbhost_120m_fck"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "usbhost_48m_fck", "usbhost_48m_fck"),
@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap44xx_clks[] = {
DT_CLK(NULL, "dss_dss_clk", "dss_dss_clk"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "dss_48mhz_clk", "dss_48mhz_clk"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "dss_fck", "dss_fck"),
- DT_CLK("omapdss_dss", "ick", "dss_fck"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "fdif_fck", "fdif_fck"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "gpio1_dbclk", "gpio1_dbclk"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "gpio2_dbclk", "gpio2_dbclk"),
The omapdss_dss driver has not used 'ick' clock for a long time, and thus the clock alias for 'ick' is not needed and can be removed. On OMAP4 the 'dss_fck' clock was recently removed, and as 'ick' was an alias for 'dss_fck', it causes a warning: ti_dt_clocks_register: failed to lookup clock node dss_fck This patch removes that warning. Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> --- drivers/clk/ti/clk-2xxx.c | 1 - drivers/clk/ti/clk-3xxx.c | 2 -- drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c | 1 - 3 files changed, 4 deletions(-)